Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:2947 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62447 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2003 15:32:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO milton.schell.de) (217.160.72.35) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 28 Jun 2003 15:32:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 9660 invoked by uid 501); 28 Jun 2003 15:32:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO eco.foo) (80.143.47.226) by kdserv.de with SMTP; 28 Jun 2003 15:32:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eco.foo (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202632FF8B; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:32:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:32:53 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: sas@eco.foo To: Jani Taskinen Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (fwd) From: sascha@schumann.cx (Sascha Schumann) > But if the summaries contain only screened (== verified) reports, > and sent one per category? Better ideas would be appreciated, of course. Well, I pretty much embrace the idea that reports ought to fall through the cracks, if they don't bother developers enough to address them. Otherwise, reports just accumulate and accumulate without having any effect. - Sascha