Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29446 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97264 invoked by uid 1010); 15 May 2007 17:39:09 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97249 invoked from network); 15 May 2007 17:39:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 May 2007 17:39:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:29788] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1B/07-39652-B30F9464 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 13:39:08 -0400 Received: (qmail 32173 invoked from network); 15 May 2007 17:39:05 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 15 May 2007 17:39:05 -0000 Message-ID: <4649F038.7050408@zend.com> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 21:39:04 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zoe Slattery CC: internals@lists.php.net, Marcus Boerger , kraghuba@in.ibm.com References: <4649D4F0.1010202@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4649D4F0.1010202@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Committing failing tests? From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 05/15/2007 07:42 PM, Zoe Slattery wrote: > Hi > > I have some updates that I'd like to make to > ext/tests/standard/array/range.phpt, the updates work fine with > unicode.semantics=off but not with unicode.semantics=on. The problem > seems to be that the warning Notices that are generated are different > with unicode on. This doesn't look like intentional behaviour but I'm > guessing it might well be something that isn't implemented yet. > > So, my question is - is it reasonable/helpful to add a test in CVS that > I know will fail if it's in an area that is currently under development? Definitely yes. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal