Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29443 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80090 invoked by uid 1010); 15 May 2007 16:52:54 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80075 invoked from network); 15 May 2007 16:52:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 May 2007 16:52:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.114 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.114 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.114] ([63.205.162.114:45963] helo=us-ex1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 33/E4-39652-465E9464 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 12:52:53 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.16.109]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 15 May 2007 09:52:50 -0700 Message-ID: <4649E549.8040303@zend.com> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:52:25 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antony Dovgal CC: SoftVirus , Zoe Slattery , Marcus Boerger , kraghuba@in.ibm.com, internals@lists.php.net References: <464891C7.3040806@googlemail.com> <862412914.20070514193633@marcus-boerger.de> <46496335.5050403@googlemail.com> <5e2913440705150052l7bac4028sc3ac26655b38b141@mail.gmail.com> <464968C5.9060608@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <464968C5.9060608@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2007 16:52:50.0005 (UTC) FILETIME=[78C96050:01C79711] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Tests - and a question From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) > That said, I'm happy with both func_b.phpt and func_basic.phpt (and even > 009.phpt) =) > We just need more tests, doesn't matter what their names look like. I think it does. If one needs to see which tests there are or are there any tests that test particular thing or inspect certain aspects of a functionality, navigating a maze of func_01234.phpt, all alike, is a nightmare. Of course, I could open all of them one by one and remember which one does what - that is if I were a being with unlimited lifespan, infallible memory and never felt bored - but for regular human it's a painful experience. So when writing a new tests it would be very good to give them names that make sense, it doesn't cost anything and helps people. Renaming old ones might be somewhat boring task, so not sure anybody ever would do that... -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/