Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29441 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52169 invoked by uid 1010); 15 May 2007 15:51:11 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52153 invoked from network); 15 May 2007 15:51:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 May 2007 15:51:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 82.94.239.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:53699] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 17/D0-39652-DE6D9464 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 11:51:10 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l4FFnxEw022974; Tue, 15 May 2007 17:50:04 +0200 Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:49:58 -0500 (CDT) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.ez.no To: Zoe Slattery cc: internals@lists.php.net, Marcus Boerger , Antony Dovgal , kraghuba@in.ibm.com In-Reply-To: <4649D4F0.1010202@googlemail.com> Message-ID: References: <4649D4F0.1010202@googlemail.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Committing failing tests? From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Tue, 15 May 2007, Zoe Slattery wrote: > I have some updates that I'd like to make to > ext/tests/standard/array/range.phpt, the updates work fine with > unicode.semantics=off but not with unicode.semantics=on. The problem seems to > be that the warning Notices that are generated are different with unicode on. > This doesn't look like intentional behaviour but I'm guessing it might well be > something that isn't implemented yet. > > So, my question is - is it reasonable/helpful to add a test in CVS that I know > will fail if it's in an area that is currently under development? I would say that it's a good idea to commit those if you are certain that the "unicode" behavior is wrong. In other cases I suggest to write a mail to internals about it. regards, Derick -- Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl | http://ez.no | http://xdebug.org