Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29440 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47866 invoked by uid 1010); 15 May 2007 15:42:49 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 47851 invoked from network); 15 May 2007 15:42:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 May 2007 15:42:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zoe.slattery@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zoe.slattery@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 64.233.184.230 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zoe.slattery@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.184.230 wr-out-0506.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [64.233.184.230] ([64.233.184.230:22501] helo=wr-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D6/40-39652-6F4D9464 for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 11:42:48 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i21so2201114wra for ; Tue, 15 May 2007 08:42:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=O4NMzdVSgwTUcW9BVDoQvsq23WfOqt9zH4QW0VVhOdIjzZ1lu3fH7ZX7t2nwBTlA6aQEokt6o7Af3scgyEWBNLop62JhiB5VCa9kLNdI6XNbIbzegvuQH/hiORYnvO5VQioBfAmDE0TMog87eXiDD+VKUO0ZPYzNf2bkUO5t0LA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZY1R83fJ+XAS4BMZN62eHeD7hgzgJFOCd6oKUoNwz4UUHo61QeGu8XRKxsyMFV08CbiWBJzcGrPLTU56UOE9CedEnPutRIahViGa96EDSgUK5pndOxWH1i0jb6TUAKsKs5S0twQ0ZHeVed2tDhtItETYTeCspqJJrFUCH1pYViQ= Received: by 10.78.136.9 with SMTP id j9mr2722851hud.1179243762697; Tue, 15 May 2007 08:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?9.20.191.73? ( [195.212.29.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o30sm16553192ugd.2007.05.15.08.42.41; Tue, 15 May 2007 08:42:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4649D4F0.1010202@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:42:40 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net CC: Marcus Boerger , Antony Dovgal , kraghuba@in.ibm.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Committing failing tests? From: zoe.slattery@googlemail.com (Zoe Slattery) Hi I have some updates that I'd like to make to ext/tests/standard/array/range.phpt, the updates work fine with unicode.semantics=off but not with unicode.semantics=on. The problem seems to be that the warning Notices that are generated are different with unicode on. This doesn't look like intentional behaviour but I'm guessing it might well be something that isn't implemented yet. So, my question is - is it reasonable/helpful to add a test in CVS that I know will fail if it's in an area that is currently under development? Zoe Slattery IBM UK