Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:2944 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94859 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2003 14:06:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO netphobia.fi) (213.243.181.8) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 28 Jun 2003 14:06:29 -0000 Received: from localhost (jani@localhost) by netphobia.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5SE6SE15513; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:06:28 +0300 X-Authentication-Warning: netphobia.fi: jani owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 17:06:28 +0300 (EEST) Sender: jani@netphobia.fi Reply-To: Jani Taskinen To: Sascha Schumann cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: networking bugs and bugme.osdl.org (fwd) From: sniper@iki.fi (Jani Taskinen) On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote: >On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Jani Taskinen wrote: > >> >> And the point was..? AFAICT, our system works fine. >> Seemed like the linux dudes are way behind. :) > > Count the developers who regularly access the bug db. > Contrast that number to the overall number of C developers. > Notice how the bug db effectively is ignored by the vast > majority of developers. I think I get now what you're after and I already am thinking of some ways to improve this. This mail has some nice ideas we could adopt: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=105675444021250&w=2 Especially the "screening" part, we already do that by setting bugs we can verify. It might be a good idea to make a list of those, instead of just all the "open" reports and send that to internals@lists.php.net. I bet most, if not all, just delete that current summary that gets send every now and then. :) We could also dedicate some categories to the maintainers of that extension/part of PHP and send a summary of open reports in them to the maintainer..? --Jani