Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29431
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 64.233.184.229 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=CZ+TZhoYUOcb9dHbvDsgu2laC+cmKpd5t1Yh/rtYAj66Q15ppfRw6sqyQ6YKC3rTXzUNvv1Vfh7a6KW5Gkijqy8xjLmFH77skO8b7corIsv2JDfVadi798ZhuCsDhW7FVRlXx/StND2VTxdz6eBVinTGfgBgY3JJ1dTjwkORoQA=
Message-ID: <4649730B.5020507@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 09:44:59 +0100
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Antony Dovgal <antony@zend.com>
CC:  internals@lists.php.net
References: <464891C7.3040806@googlemail.com>	 <862412914.20070514193633@marcus-boerger.de>	 <46496335.5050403@googlemail.com> <5e2913440705150052l7bac4028sc3ac26655b38b141@mail.gmail.com> <464968C5.9060608@zend.com>
In-Reply-To: <464968C5.9060608@zend.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Tests - and a question
From: zoe.slattery@googlemail.com (Zoe Slattery)

Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On 05/15/2007 11:52 AM, SoftVirus wrote:
>> Hello Zoe, Marcus &  Tony,
>>
>> Files names having _(basic|variation|error|object).phpt looks much 
>> better.
>> File names _[0-9]*.phpt does not give much detail about what are the
>> functions being testing by this testcase until one looks at the --TEST--
>> section of the file. It would be nice to have the name of the testcase
>> accomodate name of the functions that are being tested.  For example if
>> 009.phpt is written to test basic functionality of current() and next()
>> functions, the better file name could be current_next_basic.phpt.
>
> Well, aesthetically - yes, "current_next_basic" might look better to 
> those who don't like numbers.
> But you still have to open the test and read its --TEST-- section 
> contents to learn what exactly it's testing.
>
> That said, I'm happy with both func_b.phpt and func_basic.phpt (and 
> even 009.phpt) =)
> We just need more tests, doesn't matter what their names look like.
>
We're on it :-) Will probably have a few more questions on Unicode 
testing later, noticed that you are putting UEXPECT section in tests- 
but need to understand the implemenentation plan first...