Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29361 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7367 invoked by uid 1010); 8 May 2007 22:05:25 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 7338 invoked from network); 8 May 2007 22:05:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 May 2007 22:05:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=mls@pooteeweet.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=mls@pooteeweet.org; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pooteeweet.org from 212.112.227.169 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: mls@pooteeweet.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.112.227.169 ipx11223.ipxserver.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.112.227.169] ([212.112.227.169:51072] helo=ipx11223.ipxserver.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A5/9B-01189-E14F0464 for ; Tue, 08 May 2007 18:05:20 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF54A58027; Wed, 9 May 2007 00:05:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipx11223.ipxserver.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (flottensignalgeber [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28863-07; Wed, 9 May 2007 00:05:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dt0f2n29.tampabay.res.rr.com [24.92.178.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3890EA58037; Wed, 9 May 2007 00:05:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4640F418.1030803@pooteeweet.org> Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 18:05:12 -0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stanislav Malyshev Cc: internals@lists.php.net References: <139872287.20070504170744@marcus-boerger.de> <1348470081.20070504221609@marcus-boerger.de> <463EB3FD.4020009@zend.com> <1062653277.20070507092725@marcus-boerger.de> <463ED871.8080606@zend.com> <463F1B3A.3070703@pooteeweet.org> <463F74EA.7030704@zend.com> <1377895609.20070507211530@marcus-boerger.de> <463F8909.6000709@zend.com> <1376921277.20070508103616@marcus-boerger.de> <46406D8A.3010005@zend.com> <46407A99.5010907@pooteeweet.org> <46409974.9050900@zend.com> <4640F1B2.7080600@chiaraquartet.net> <4640F27C.5070303@pooteeweet.org> <4640F353.2070100@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <4640F353.2070100@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by somedaemon at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3 From: mls@pooteeweet.org (Lukas Kahwe Smith) Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> I also just realized, these are also all tools where you probably do >> not want APC to store the bytecode in memory. Furthermore it is >> however still quite useful to have your unit test executing quickly. > > How speed of the tests would depend on speed of the loading phpunit > runner? I don't believe reading a couple of files phpunit runner needs > with PHP would do much difference compared to reading same files with C. Yes, of course if you are looking to run 1 hour worth of unit tests, the initial load up time is not relevant. But if you just want to quickly run the tests that you feel are most likely affected, the start up time is relevant. regards, Lukas