Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29354 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75686 invoked by uid 1010); 8 May 2007 20:55:08 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75671 invoked from network); 8 May 2007 20:55:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 May 2007 20:55:08 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 72.77.217.26 static-72-77-217-26.tampfl.dsl-w.verizon.net Received: from [72.77.217.26] ([72.77.217.26:2565] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A1/47-01189-BA3E0464 for ; Tue, 08 May 2007 16:55:07 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net,Stanislav Malyshev Message-ID: <4640E38D.4070007@php.net> Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 16:54:37 -0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Macintosh/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Marcus Boerger , Andi Gutmans , Edin Kadribasic References: <139872287.20070504170744@marcus-boerger.de> <9DC00D11-00A5-40DB-A397-8454C48FA448@prohost.org> <1525138013.20070504193205@marcus-boerger.de> <463B70A1.4010505@zend.com> <463B7232.7000205@php.net> <463B8B36.5010906@zend.com> <1992195966.20070504214413@marcus-boerger.de> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE2FEE88@us-ex1.zend.net> <1291095925.20070504220553@marcus-boerger.de> <4640CC76.7090104@php.net> <4640CEAC.4050107@zend.com> <4640D1C5.2010000@php.net> <4640D647.7030509@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <4640D647.7030509@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 72.77.217.26 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3 From: davey@php.net (Davey Shafik) Stanislav Malyshev wrote: >> No, not "in other words". I said the words I said, because I meant >> those words. I'm talking about small *production* deployments. I don't >> see > > Why small deployment can't use PHP phar then? If they don't use bytecode > cache parsing PHP on each request obviously isn't a problem for them. > Because sometimes you like to not waste resources unnecessarily? Maybe because their host only allows default PHP config and doesn't provide PEAR or PECL? - Davey