Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29338 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25468 invoked by uid 1010); 8 May 2007 15:25:36 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25452 invoked from network); 8 May 2007 15:25:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 May 2007 15:25:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.114 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.114 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.114] ([63.205.162.114:20113] helo=us-ex1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 50/03-01189-C6690464 for ; Tue, 08 May 2007 11:25:35 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.17.44]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 8 May 2007 08:25:27 -0700 Message-ID: <46409661.4000106@zend.com> Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 08:25:21 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lukas Kahwe Smith CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <0E.B4.18102.F9DB9264@pb1.pair.com> <463F9FD0.3030009@zend.com> <463FA701.5030707@pooteeweet.org> <46406F89.7030000@zend.com> <4640749E.20005@zend.com> <46407819.40808@zend.com> <46407B27.1010705@pooteeweet.org> In-Reply-To: <46407B27.1010705@pooteeweet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2007 15:25:27.0782 (UTC) FILETIME=[1B496060:01C79185] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] serialize and cache handling From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) > Well as the topic implies I am quite sure that the user request was > about caching into a custom file and not inside the session. Both are > frequent use cases. If his cache had no locking before, what changed? -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/