Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29333 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75349 invoked by uid 1010); 8 May 2007 13:16:16 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 75332 invoked from network); 8 May 2007 13:16:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 May 2007 13:16:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 63.205.162.114 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 63.205.162.114 unknown Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [63.205.162.114] ([63.205.162.114:11973] helo=us-ex1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 96/34-10930-F1870464 for ; Tue, 08 May 2007 09:16:16 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.17.44]) by us-ex1.zend.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 8 May 2007 06:16:13 -0700 Message-ID: <46407819.40808@zend.com> Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 06:16:09 -0700 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: Lukas Kahwe Smith , Mathias Bank , internals@lists.php.net References: <0E.B4.18102.F9DB9264@pb1.pair.com> <463F9FD0.3030009@zend.com> <463FA701.5030707@pooteeweet.org> <46406F89.7030000@zend.com> <4640749E.20005@zend.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2007 13:16:13.0326 (UTC) FILETIME=[0D454AE0:01C79173] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] serialize and cache handling From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) > ? Nobody is talking about sessions here, just about the serialize() You mean you are not talking about sessions. I, however, do. Sessions are one of the obvious examples where such functionality could improve performance. > function that is also used for a myriad of other things... Oh really? I guess that's why we talk about _adding_ stuff to it in order to make it more efficient *in certain scenarios* and not replacing it with the new one. Precisely the scenarios where external locking would be happening anyway - when either using sessions or caching. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/