Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29260 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62850 invoked by uid 1010); 7 May 2007 12:37:17 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62835 invoked from network); 7 May 2007 12:37:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 May 2007 12:37:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 82.94.239.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:58301] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F8/01-56106-B7D1F364 for ; Mon, 07 May 2007 08:37:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l47CbCCd017002; Mon, 7 May 2007 14:37:12 +0200 Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 14:37:07 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.ez.no To: Antony Dovgal cc: Ilia Alshanetsky , Marcus Boerger , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <463E4326.7010809@zend.com> Message-ID: References: <139872287.20070504170744@marcus-boerger.de> <736AED54-1272-4924-A07D-3166A1742A2F@prohost.org> <463E4326.7010809@zend.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3 From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Mon, 7 May 2007, Antony Dovgal wrote: > On 05/06/2007 10:11 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > > IMHO one good reason to start a new branch for 5.x would be the ability to > > get rid off register_globals and magic_quotes in the 5 series without > > having to wait for PHP6 to come around. > > That's exactly the reason I'm against creating 5_3 branch at this moment - I'm > afraid that you (and everybody else) will start patching it and 5_2 will > become 4_4 as it is now - security fixes only.. once in a month.. maybe.. or > maybe not. > You would be busy with 5_3, even though there is enough work in 5_2 branch. Yes, and development should not be done in a branch anyway, but in HEAD. regards, Derick