Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29246 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78025 invoked by uid 1010); 7 May 2007 08:38:48 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 78010 invoked from network); 7 May 2007 08:38:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 May 2007 08:38:47 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 82.94.239.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:33421] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A1/2E-52548-595EE364 for ; Mon, 07 May 2007 04:38:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l478cfJB010226; Mon, 7 May 2007 10:38:42 +0200 Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 10:38:37 +0200 (CEST) X-X-Sender: derick@kossu.ez.no To: "Unknown W. Brackets" cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <45.68.52548.ED8CE364@pb1.pair.com> Message-ID: References: <20070504201847.547329627@smtp.haun-online.de> <05.C4.06274.89F1E364@pb1.pair.com> <1178477928.4640.62.camel@johannes.nop> <45.68.52548.ED8CE364@pb1.pair.com> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Bug? Raw POST data in PHP 5.2.2, take two From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Sun, 6 May 2007, Unknown W. Brackets wrote: > Sorry, I apologize. Although you were curt I should not have been so in > reply. > > I used to manage development of a reasonably popular open source project, and > if one of our developers had ever said something like that, it would have > greatly annoyed me. You never really lose that. > > Although I still think you were somewhat rude, I should not have called you on > it as such, which was rude of me. I am sorry. It's not worse than not using a real name to post with.... Derick