Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29234 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40417 invoked by uid 1010); 7 May 2007 06:52:24 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40402 invoked from network); 7 May 2007 06:52:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 May 2007 06:52:24 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.162.232 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.162.232 nz-out-0506.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [64.233.162.232] ([64.233.162.232:9052] helo=nz-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BD/09-52548-6ACCE364 for ; Mon, 07 May 2007 02:52:23 -0400 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k1so1614775nzf for ; Sun, 06 May 2007 23:52:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=I0C3anKDZofG+1ZMTm0p/U5RtXoMSj2RAnOOEOBTKkzfy5n+PJ2UW0TivlWGWgq1T34WSpeLeIe+7mBIJHYcPx9eU9PgjuO8qCWEZXj8zRwax7YUbgz5QMOZ8R8GYTXUUrxWX1MS43xDNvcdsZELPaqvehYZtQADQoDXqMgaR7k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bclzjnwJ3VCt2F1Z23bSY6iCVXNV6fwpLRMUNHZjHzE0QiXQHxY2vTTF2O/t70/pXtIoICiRGC2JhMXzZBvrf1D4GHLLNEJ8vqeGi9OJPiz1jh0VRYlmziaMl68wK/laypoAZptH8iVNkBpvfSHzWMY+k3ghjMFw9Pt/2xdvY1c= Received: by 10.115.90.1 with SMTP id s1mr1506323wal.1178520740171; Sun, 06 May 2007 23:52:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.178.20 with HTTP; Sun, 6 May 2007 23:52:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 08:52:20 +0200 To: "Stanislav Malyshev" Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <463ECB29.6060909@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <139872287.20070504170744@marcus-boerger.de> <463B70A1.4010505@zend.com> <463B7232.7000205@php.net> <463B8B36.5010906@zend.com> <1992195966.20070504214413@marcus-boerger.de> <463B9271.3040009@zend.com> <1348470081.20070504221609@marcus-boerger.de> <463EB3FD.4020009@zend.com> <463ECB29.6060909@zend.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3 From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) Hi, On 5/7/07, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > A little note about executing a phar file, no phar extension is > > required to execute a phar archive, neither to create it (see > > Right, but php and PEAR are required to read/create/inspect the archive. Who has inspected pear.phar? Not a lot I think, but we all installed pear using at least once (without ext/phar). Not pear directly but PHP_Archive or the pecl/phar. However phar is good to test something in a non intrusive way (no file to install, you can do "php foo.phar" or run it in a webserver if you rename it to .php) or as a self contained installer. But I would not recommend to ever use a phar for other purposes like in a production environment. --Pierre