Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29231 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34808 invoked by uid 1010); 7 May 2007 06:35:22 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 34793 invoked from network); 7 May 2007 06:35:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 7 May 2007 06:35:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.184.234 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.184.234 wr-out-0506.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [64.233.184.234] ([64.233.184.234:6871] helo=wr-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DB/28-52548-9A8CE364 for ; Mon, 07 May 2007 02:35:22 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i21so1506688wra for ; Sun, 06 May 2007 23:35:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ifIRMJFsjNUctqWenuz9pVUdoWSFP7xnKnrGKGMhj3CRu245nE9X2UouxeueR3gITsS0nUcickCQ8XSwko0mtwpIsG/Fwsj17j2HjGEgKY4Fju9rv5xKP8iEBYP3Q2RFw5Y7Xr9ZFZhyYoempTtdjNAkj+k9tWrS5P05mfLJjCs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JPbp+ZJl+aIsyahj1fYx5kAUdjGQ4QZogFPSDUn2KuX2jIHOsRulfF/4TXmrwUtqCiV0dEixUIHsIth8ESdB+/4ZlXl2j8ANYBJLn3WGymFORjR5gzPu2u308dQ3iAistbxXb/L/rlzgTWmYhKO/BSRBbfQlfvjJCRXf+UytaBY= Received: by 10.114.183.1 with SMTP id g1mr361759waf.1178519716351; Sun, 06 May 2007 23:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.178.20 with HTTP; Sun, 6 May 2007 23:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 08:35:16 +0200 To: "Stanislav Malyshev" Cc: "Marcus Boerger" , "Edin Kadribasic" , "Andi Gutmans" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <463EB3FD.4020009@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <139872287.20070504170744@marcus-boerger.de> <9DC00D11-00A5-40DB-A397-8454C48FA448@prohost.org> <1525138013.20070504193205@marcus-boerger.de> <463B70A1.4010505@zend.com> <463B7232.7000205@php.net> <463B8B36.5010906@zend.com> <1992195966.20070504214413@marcus-boerger.de> <463B9271.3040009@zend.com> <1348470081.20070504221609@marcus-boerger.de> <463EB3FD.4020009@zend.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3 From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre) Hi, On 5/7/07, Stanislav Malyshev wrote: > > pear install phar - or - pecl install phar - done > > oh wait the point is that pecl install doesn't work or is in 99% no option > > And what is "pear install"? I don't have such command in my Windows by > default. Neither I have it on my Linux. I would have to install PEAR for > that, right? Even only to know what's inside. A little note about executing a phar file, no phar extension is required to execute a phar archive, neither to create it (see http://pear.php.net/package/PHP_Archive) . We distribute pear.phar since a couple of stable releases already. It is easier/faster to create it using pecl/phar. I'm sure there is a big difference (performence) when a phar is executed with or without pecl/phar, it is slow anyway. I see this extension as a packager tool only (where end users are packages user). NB: Recent changes in the extensions may be available only in the extension, I did not follow its recent developments. --Pierre