Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29218 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45659 invoked by uid 1010); 6 May 2007 18:05:25 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 45643 invoked from network); 6 May 2007 18:05:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 May 2007 18:05:25 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 217.84.189.179 pd954bdb3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de Received: from [217.84.189.179] ([217.84.189.179:16444] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 69/B3-06274-2E81E364 for ; Sun, 06 May 2007 14:05:23 -0400 Message-ID: <69.B3.06274.2E81E364@pb1.pair.com> To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 20:04:49 +0200 Reply-To: webmaster@hp-film.de User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <58F22246-8E3C-4A3C-87C8-1358B18E2328@krug.dk> <4638D025.3030108@krug.dk> <30.71.27633.08C4A364@pb1.pair.com> <48.F6.18811.5D41D364@pb1.pair.com> <463DE329.8070700@php.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 217.84.189.179 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Help with the snaps site From: webmaster@hp-film.de (Jan Reininghaus) David Coallier wrote: > Yes we have discussed that on IRC with edin and the whole idea was > USING tabs. So here I'll state exactly the idea as it seems to > misunderstood: > > The idea is clearly and simply to use tabs for the different branches. > Using javascript was just simple and fast in this case and yes we > should handle the tabs statically. > > The only reason why we are *making it work* in javascript is not > because I want it to be in javascript, but more because I wanted to > have tabs working quickly and easy which is why I did in javascript > without the need of PHP. > > I hereby say that yes, we will be using tabs as it is much easier to > code and it will work on more browsers (I am thinking of links/lynx) > for instance. Using tabs is also a good idea, especially because you avoid space problems by that. My second draw would look like this: http://hp-film.pytalhost.de/test/php/snaps_draw2.png Because I am currently short of time I didn't include the new features for the 5.2.x branch this time but I hope you see how I mean it... I think it would be better to write the date for the next snapshot next to the snapshot itself (like I have done it in my draw) and not to write it in a list on the left of the page. I have some difficulties with finding out to which snapshots on the right the dates on the left belong.