Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29216
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.132.251 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=V8TLWSJTThc+zrZD9DV/MaE1FEJW69RsnNjRf1kDF1Zr3vXrTnLtW+6OHILc8pOqM5nIhgXSSxnhMclyBTLl8IfqAAiKsfihZ8QGiyak4liI0l5EowiQepVJBIe/lkorS6CMLE+IBcNW1vKPzNIeVPGLlFkVXJ+uy20Z4XgngWg=
Message-ID: <d8269d910705060728r31bc52dcqadd95f50d526d99@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 16:28:05 +0200
To: M.Sokolewicz <tularis@php.net>
Cc: "David Coallier" <davidc@php.net>, webmaster@hp-film.de, 
	internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <463DE329.8070700@php.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <58F22246-8E3C-4A3C-87C8-1358B18E2328@krug.dk>
	 <D6.17.42224.12BA6364@pb1.pair.com> <4638D025.3030108@krug.dk>
	 <30.71.27633.08C4A364@pb1.pair.com>
	 <48.F6.18811.5D41D364@pb1.pair.com>
	 <b5f7bf6c0705052051y3669c4e0pad02b88ebac5ccfb@mail.gmail.com>
	 <d8269d910705060121y4b009a9aqbf1407f23bb4178a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b5f7bf6c0705060615i27e515ct25a798d534e7d9b5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <d8269d910705060649w32c6d783x1563ca1da25060ac@mail.gmail.com>
	 <463DE329.8070700@php.net>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Help with the snaps site
From: tijnema@gmail.com ("Tijnema !")

On 5/6/07, M.Sokolewicz <tularis@php.net> wrote:
> Tijnema ! wrote:
> > On 5/6/07, David Coallier <davidc@php.net> wrote:
> >> On 5/6/07, Tijnema ! <tijnema@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > On 5/6/07, David Coallier <davidc@php.net> wrote:
> >> > > On 5/5/07, Jan Reininghaus <webmaster@hp-film.de> wrote:
> >> > > > I am currently working on my second draw for the page, but I have a
> >> > > > question. For my first draw I assumed that all of the new
> >> features will
> >> > > > be available for all three branches, but is this actually true?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > By the way, I don't know whether you are aware that all build
> >> processes
> >> > > > of the win32 snapshots have failed for one day now.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> >> > > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Perhaps something like this could be cool:
> >> > > http://dev.agoraproduction.com/php/snaps/
> >> > >
> >> > > The css might be a bit off as I just wanted to do it quick, but you
> >> > > see the idea :)
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > David
> >> >
> >> > Yes, it is quick, as it doesn't work good in IE6, which is the most
> >> > common browser (http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp)
> >> > Might be a good alternative for the snaps site, as it is never too
> >> > larg :) But it should work on IE6 too of course.
> >> >
> >> > Tijnema
> >> >
> >> Oops, well works in IE6.. just looks like hell.. I'd be interested in
> >> seeing the % of the browsers on that specific site, it's not like any
> >> common website thus can't rely on w3schools imho.
> >
> > Not that it matters how many users are using IE6, PHP should be
> > atleast IE6, IE7, FF, Mozilla, Safari and Netscape compatible. (maybe
> > more?)
> >>
> >> Anyways, you are right, looks like hell in IE6, try it in firefox or
> >> opera .. the goal is to get an idea... not having a stable state with
> >> everything working right away, etc...
> >
> > Ok, but are you sure it will be possible in IE6? Didn't take a look at
> > your code yet, and i guess it will work, but we need to be sure of
> > course.
> >>
> >> So look with a decent browser (wink) and tell me f you like the idea
> >> of the tabs, that's the main point I am looking to get feedbacks on.
> >>
> >>
> >> David
> >
> > Yeah, i tested it with Firefox, and it's a good idea. I don't like the
> > style of the button, i think it doesn't really fit into the website,
> > so maybe if you could change the buttons to a little bit more PHP-like
> > it is cool for me, but well, it's not my site :P
> >
> > Tijnema
>
> Instead of using all tat javascript and trying to "make it work" in all
> possible browsers, why don't you simply make multiple pages, with static
> links from page to page (ie. page1.html for the first button, page2.html
> for the 2nd, etc.).
I wouldn't call the pages page1.html etc. These pages are all
generated by a PHP script, so it's better to use like this:
page.php?version=4, page.php?version=5, page.php?version=6


> And as for button appearances, just make it look
> like the tabs in the PHP bug tracker and it'll all be fine IMO.

Yes, good point :) These buttons would fit nice into the snaps site.

But that's only how the PHP version are organized, how would you
organize the files on a page?

Tijnema