Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29213 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52868 invoked by uid 1010); 6 May 2007 13:15:35 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 52853 invoked from network); 6 May 2007 13:15:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 May 2007 13:15:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=david.coallier@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=david.coallier@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.132.249 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: david.coallier@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.132.249 an-out-0708.google.com Received: from [209.85.132.249] ([209.85.132.249:17306] helo=an-out-0708.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4A/59-06274-4F4DD364 for ; Sun, 06 May 2007 09:15:33 -0400 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d31so53361and for ; Sun, 06 May 2007 06:15:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=NOUJrpvH1DO7mttY5G9fCIXYfUcC2/9l7Vepap/tbm7g4DAct/BzAcE5oeSfx+izrGY2hTYx12fpe6TtHKKGk7S7wRSSULA4//+kbs2IVIFEFbthatmFPl9e05yX8RYEXHAOG+Ox0xC6BEj5L7KDgs4sb9zq6KHiV40QdGXOVNU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=hLTNYKgWwTnqOH8CzhN24NwLQPbAH/Dlk827UI0RjFbdU2R6tZqE1cQJLysJd743YUOHJ4qerl1BGDyTLIWAYSMcU+eOSP445AsigCthK59g3q8b+Gl1TUmEhFcz3W4Qot50m03kz1drcBnryKzkryanuKksc6oWM4QOo58jSC0= Received: by 10.100.207.16 with SMTP id e16mr4069636ang.1178457329326; Sun, 06 May 2007 06:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.226.11 with HTTP; Sun, 6 May 2007 06:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 08:15:29 -0500 Sender: david.coallier@gmail.com To: "Tijnema !" Cc: webmaster@hp-film.de, internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <58F22246-8E3C-4A3C-87C8-1358B18E2328@krug.dk> <4638D025.3030108@krug.dk> <30.71.27633.08C4A364@pb1.pair.com> <48.F6.18811.5D41D364@pb1.pair.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: c9c002d3447a4fd2 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Help with the snaps site From: davidc@php.net ("David Coallier") On 5/6/07, Tijnema ! wrote: > On 5/6/07, David Coallier wrote: > > On 5/5/07, Jan Reininghaus wrote: > > > I am currently working on my second draw for the page, but I have a > > > question. For my first draw I assumed that all of the new features will > > > be available for all three branches, but is this actually true? > > > > > > By the way, I don't know whether you are aware that all build processes > > > of the win32 snapshots have failed for one day now. > > > > > > -- > > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps something like this could be cool: > > http://dev.agoraproduction.com/php/snaps/ > > > > The css might be a bit off as I just wanted to do it quick, but you > > see the idea :) > > > > > > David > > Yes, it is quick, as it doesn't work good in IE6, which is the most > common browser (http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp) > Might be a good alternative for the snaps site, as it is never too > larg :) But it should work on IE6 too of course. > > Tijnema > Oops, well works in IE6.. just looks like hell.. I'd be interested in seeing the % of the browsers on that specific site, it's not like any common website thus can't rely on w3schools imho. Anyways, you are right, looks like hell in IE6, try it in firefox or opera .. the goal is to get an idea... not having a stable state with everything working right away, etc... So look with a decent browser (wink) and tell me f you like the idea of the tabs, that's the main point I am looking to get feedbacks on. David