Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29197 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56078 invoked by uid 1010); 4 May 2007 20:05:58 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56063 invoked from network); 4 May 2007 20:05:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 May 2007 20:05:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 85.214.94.56 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:36830] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 69/CA-21644-3229B364 for ; Fri, 04 May 2007 16:05:56 -0400 Received: from baumbart.mbo (dslb-084-063-051-128.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.51.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED9F1B363E; Fri, 4 May 2007 22:05:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 22:05:53 +0200 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1291095925.20070504220553@marcus-boerger.de> To: Andi Gutmans CC: Stas Malyshev , Edin Kadribasic , In-Reply-To: <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE2FEE88@us-ex1.zend.net> References: <139872287.20070504170744@marcus-boerger.de> <9DC00D11-00A5-40DB-A397-8454C48FA448@prohost.org> <1525138013.20070504193205@marcus-boerger.de> <463B70A1.4010505@zend.com> <463B7232.7000205@php.net> <463B8B36.5010906@zend.com> <1992195966.20070504214413@marcus-boerger.de> <698DE66518E7CA45812BD18E807866CE2FEE88@us-ex1.zend.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3 From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Andi, Friday, May 4, 2007, 9:55:23 PM, you wrote: > I think phar is a nice idea but honestly haven't had enough bandwidth to > check it out in more detail. Has there been some thorough analysis on > the performance impact of it and whether this is the optimal recommended > way for our users to distribute apps? The idea is actually very > interesting but we should be pretty certain we're doing the right thing > before we distribute it. We can spend some time looking at it in more > detail. You guys spent a good effort in such analysis in the past. Would be very nice to hear something in that direction from you. > Btw, it seems to me that because of the way Apache works for most of our > users it actually won't be that useful and just act like a .tar archieve > which needs to be extracted. This is unless the user implements some > kind of front controller. It would really be nice if we have the 99% > common Apache application use-case figured out and docuemnted before we > put our PHP dev team weight behind it. Or am I completely missing some > magic here? not at all. It perfectly works for includes. But i have no idea how to use it from a url directly...well you can provide some tricks. But i wouldn't recommend those. > Andi >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marcus Boerger [mailto:helly@php.net] >> Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 12:44 PM >> To: Stas Malyshev >> Cc: Edin Kadribasic; internals@lists.php.net >> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Starting 5.3 >> >> Hello Stanislav, >> >> - you don't need a tool - well php - but hey you probbaly >> have that tool >> - you can run phar archives out of the box - untouched >> - you can extract phar archives and run them - still untouched >> - you can provide phar archives that do not require a phar extension >> >> To your question "is phar so important that everybody needs >> it in the main source." I think the above means it should. >> >> best regards >> marcus >> >> Friday, May 4, 2007, 9:36:22 PM, you wrote: >> >> >> obsolete set of tools (autoconf-2.13, etc.). Having Phar >> in the main >> >> distro will open up a whole new way to distribute PHP applications >> >> which would be a great advantage. The current system of >> distributing >> >> a bunch of PHP files has some shortcomings. >> >> > I'm personally not sure phar is that great way of >> distributing apps - >> > it's yet another format not supported by standard tools and I don't >> > really see much of an advantage to using it versus just making a >> > package with any of the existing package formats and I see >> a number of >> > disadvantages - non-standard format, hard to work with >> packed scripts >> > with available filesystem tools, etc. But that's my opinion and I >> > fully expect some people to hold exactly the opposite opinion. The >> > question is however is phar so important that everybody >> needs it in the main source? >> > -- >> > Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer stas@zend.com >> > http://www.zend.com/ >> >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> Marcus >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To >> unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> Best regards, Marcus