Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:29126
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 80.190.230.99 cause and error)
To: "'Rasmus Lerdorf'" <rasmus@lerdorf.com>,
	"'Oliver Block'" <lists@block-online.eu>
Cc: <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <A4.E8.40858.9DA16364@pb1.pair.com> <46367F96.6080205@cschneid.com> <46368091.4050606@lerdorf.com> <200705010212.52622.lists@block-online.eu> <4636883E.7010603@lerdorf.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 13:22:13 +0200
Message-ID: <000c01c78be2$f7c91a10$0201a8c0@VEGA>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <4636883E.7010603@lerdorf.com>
Thread-Index: AceLhu9MV2Wcup5nTW+RhgrY+7aEVgAW5VUg
Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Setting HTTP results code vs. HTTP type
From: thetaphi@php.net ("Uwe Schindler")

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rasmus Lerdorf [mailto:rasmus@lerdorf.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:22 AM
> To: Oliver Block
> Cc: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Setting HTTP results code vs. HTTP type
> 
> Oliver Block wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 1. Mai 2007 01:49 schrieb Rasmus Lerdorf:
> >
> >> This came up many times on the Apache lists years ago, and Roy Fielding
> >> who wrote that spec repeatedly said it was fine to reply with a 1.1
> >> response to a 1.0 request.
> >
> > Did he give any rationale for his view?
> 
> Go read the archives.  And note that I only said it was fine to respond
> with a 1.1 reply, that doesn't mean it is fine to send an encoding the
> client doesn't support.

And that's exactly what other web servers also do:
I come from Sun One Web Server 6.1 and 7.0), so I can tell what they do:
They respond always with HTTP/1.1 but if the request came in with HTTP/1.0
they do not use chunked encoding for the reply and use "Connection: close".

Uwe