Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28867 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15444 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Apr 2007 20:03:39 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 15428 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2007 20:03:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Apr 2007 20:03:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lists@block-online.eu; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lists@block-online.eu; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain block-online.eu from 81.169.146.246 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lists@block-online.eu X-Host-Fingerprint: 81.169.146.246 em-p07-ob.rzone.de Solaris 10 (beta) Received: from [81.169.146.246] ([81.169.146.246:34206] helo=em-p07-ob.rzone.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 88/C0-18278-896D3264 for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 16:03:38 -0400 Received: from post.webmailer.de (ket.store [192.168.40.116]) by bjorn-em-01.store (RZmta 5.5) with ESMTP id B0321aj3GBPpRP for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:03:34 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from httpd@localhost) by post.webmailer.de (8.13.6/8.13.6) id l3GK3YPQ012048 for internals@lists.php.net; Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:03:34 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:03:34 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <200704162003.l3GK3YPQ012048@post.webmailer.de> X-Authentication-Warning: ket.store: httpd set sender to lists@block-online.eu using -f To: internals@lists.php.net X-Priority: 3 X-Abuse: 109444 / 84.63.160.42 X-RZG-MBID: 00HmG4eiyu2pxioG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-RZG-CLASS-ID: em07 Subject: Re: Re: [PHP-DEV] dropping asp_tags in HEAD From: lists@block-online.eu ("Oliver Block") =09 Hi Bart, is that a topic on the todo list? Are you going to make php6 xml-parsable? = Or what else could be the reason for xml standard compliance. As far as I know= , php is parsed by its own language parser. Forgive me if I am not savvy to t= he future plans of the php group. Regards, Oliver ----- original Nachricht -------- Betreff: Re: [PHP-DEV] dropping asp_tags in HEAD Gesendet: So, 15. Apr 2007 Von: Bart de Boer > The XML standard... >=20 > HTML 4.01 compliance seems a bit trivial since there's already so much=20 > forgiveness going on around that spec anyway... >=20 >=20 >=20 > Oliver Block wrote: > > Am Samstag, 14. April 2007 11:49 schrieb Bart de Boer: > >> PHP's convention is currently > >> responsible for people creating non-standards-compliant documents... A= nd > >> I think we should take that responsibility and clean up the mess we > >> made... The XML spec is outside our scope... What's inside >> our business... > >=20 > > About which standard are you talking? > >=20 > > Regards, > >=20 > > Oliver > >=20 > >> Tijnema ! wrote: > >>> On 4/14/07, Bart de Boer wrote: > >>>> I think ASP tags should go too... Simply because it's not standards > >>>> compliant and I think it's good if people are forced to make nice > >>>> standards compliant documents... I'd even go so far as to favor > dropping > >>>> short tags too... > >>>> > >>>> n"; ?> > >>>> > >>>> What a mess!... > >>> What about the even shorter version: > >>> n"; ?> > >>> > >>> That's real ugly code... > >>> > >>> Tijnema > >>> > >>>> Guilherme Blanco wrote: > >>>>> I really can't see a reason to mantain ASP tags. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ok, short tags is good because of , but it doesn't > >>>>> behavior well with XML documents. So, if your intention is to chang= e > >>>>> short tags to ASP tag in a near future, ok. ASP tags does not mix X= ML > >>>>> documents. > >>>>> Otherwise, ASP tags is the most useless thing I've ever heard in PH= P > >>>>> sphere. I really don't know why wasn't it dropped in PHP5. > >>>>> > >>>>> That's what I think... IMHO. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> []s, > >>>>> > >>>>> On 4/13/07, Tijnema ! wrote: > >>>>>> On 4/13/07, Richard Lynch wrote: > >>>>>>> On Fri, April 13, 2007 9:16 am, Tijnema ! wrote: > >>>>>>>> I don't see why you are all against dropping the ASP tags. I see > >>>>>>>> people using ASP & PHP in one script, what would that do? If > >>>> ASP runs > >>>> > >>>>>>>> first then there isn't a problem, but if PHP runs first, it woul= d > >>>>>>>> execute the ASP code. > >>>>>>> There are actually people running both PHP and ASP in series to > >>>>>>> generate HTML? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If they are, they can turn ASP tags *OFF* in php.ini > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> And they certainly aren't going to be distributing that setup > >>>> outside > >>>> > >>>>>>> their own little world... > >>>>>> I've seen such code on the net some time ago... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> But should you distribute PHP code with ASP tags? That's not good > >>>>>> either i think. So there's no use of the ASP tags, and they can on= ly > >>>>>> interfere with ASP. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Tijnema > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >=20 > --=20 > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >=20 >=20 --- original Nachricht Ende ----