Newsgroups: php.internals,php.qa
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28843 php.qa:28177
Return-Path: <sebastian@nohn.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 8788 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Apr 2007 07:04:53 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 8756 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2007 07:04:53 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 15 Apr 2007 07:04:53 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=sebastian@nohn.net; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=sebastian@nohn.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain nohn.net from 85.214.77.40 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: sebastian@nohn.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.77.40 bxpcsr02.nohn.net Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4)
Received: from [85.214.77.40] ([85.214.77.40:42712] helo=bxpcsr02.nohn.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id C2/20-05491-29EC1264 for <php-qa@lists.php.net>; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 03:04:52 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bxpcsr02.nohn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0274F3E4115;
	Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:05:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bxpcsr02.nohn.net ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (h939937.serverkompetenz.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 22598-04; Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:05:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ssl.nohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bxpcsr02.nohn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA80B3E4114;
	Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:05:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 84.63.50.23
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user sebastian@nohn.net)
        by ssl.nohn.org with HTTP;
        Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:05:36 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1956.84.63.50.23.1176620736.squirrel@ssl.nohn.org>
In-Reply-To: <46211D80.8050609@zend.com>
References: <46210672.2010804@nohn.net> <46211D80.8050609@zend.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 09:05:36 +0200 (CEST)
To: "Antony Dovgal" <antony@zend.com>
Cc: "Sebastian Nohn" <sebastian@nohn.net>,
 "Zend Framework General" <fw-general@lists.zend.com>,
 ilia@php.net,
 php-qa@lists.php.net,
 internals@lists.php.net
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] ZF 0.8.0 Unit Tests behaving different on PHP 5.2.1 
     and PHP 5.2.2-dev
From: sebastian@nohn.net ("Sebastian Nohn")

On Sat, April 14, 2007 8:29 pm, Antony Dovgal wrote:
> On 04/14/2007 08:50 PM, Sebastian Nohn wrote:
>> On PHP 5.2.1, ZendFramework 0.8.0 Unit Tests pass, while they fail on
>> PHP 5.2.2-dev (latest CVS) on the same machine:
>>
>> 1) testDate(Zend_Date_DateObjectTest)
>> Failed asserting that <string:6900000000> is identical to
>> <string:6.9E+9>
>> .../tests/Zend/Date/DateObjectTest.php:408
>
> Would be nice to have a short but complete reproduce case.
> Referring to some test (which I personally have never seen) is not really
> helpful.

This was the idea why PHP and ZF developers should come together. However,
I investigated the issue and here is a small testcase:

<?php
$a = 6900000000;
var_dump($a);
$b = "A is: ".$a;
var_dump($b);
?>

5.2.1 output is:

float(6.9E+9)
string(16) "A is: 6900000000"

5.2.2-dev output is:

float(6.9E+9)
string(12) "A is: 6.9E+9"

- Sebastian