Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28839
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain block-online.eu from 81.169.146.160 cause and error)
To: internals@lists.php.net
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 00:42:16 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <461E894C.104@zend.com> <d8269d910704140213h57e828fam2bcd4c55b1ea80c4@mail.gmail.com> <4620A3C1.8030701@mediawave.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4620A3C1.8030701@mediawave.nl>
Cc: Bart de Boer <bart@mediawave.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-ID: <200704150042.16848.lists@block-online.eu>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] dropping asp_tags in HEAD
From: lists@block-online.eu (Oliver Block)

Am Samstag, 14. April 2007 11:49 schrieb Bart de Boer:
> PHP's convention is currently
> responsible for people creating non-standards-compliant documents... And
> I think we should take that responsibility and clean up the mess we
> made... The XML spec is outside our scope... What's inside <?php tags is
> our business...

About which standard are you talking?

Regards,

Oliver

>
> Tijnema ! wrote:
> > On 4/14/07, Bart de Boer <bart@mediawave.nl> wrote:
> >> I think ASP tags should go too... Simply because it's not standards
> >> compliant and I think it's good if people are forced to make nice
> >> standards compliant documents... I'd even go so far as to favor dropping
> >> short tags too...
> >>
> >> <? echo "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\" ?>\n"; ?>
> >>
> >> What a mess!...
> >
> > What about the even shorter version:
> > <?="<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\" ?>\n"; ?>
> >
> > That's real ugly code...
> >
> > Tijnema
> >
> >> Guilherme Blanco wrote:
> >> > I really can't see a reason to mantain ASP tags.
> >> >
> >> > Ok, short tags is good because of <?=$something?>, but it doesn't
> >> > behavior well with XML documents. So, if your intention is to change
> >> > short tags to ASP tag in a near future, ok. ASP tags does not mix XML
> >> > documents.
> >> > Otherwise, ASP tags is the most useless thing I've ever heard in PHP
> >> > sphere. I really don't know why wasn't it dropped in PHP5.
> >> >
> >> > That's what I think... IMHO.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > []s,
> >> >
> >> > On 4/13/07, Tijnema ! <tijnema@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> On 4/13/07, Richard Lynch <ceo@l-i-e.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Fri, April 13, 2007 9:16 am, Tijnema ! wrote:
> >> >> > > I don't see why you are all against dropping the ASP tags. I see
> >> >> > > people using ASP & PHP in one script, what would that do? If
> >>
> >> ASP runs
> >>
> >> >> > > first then there isn't a problem, but if PHP runs first, it would
> >> >> > > execute the ASP code.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > There are actually people running both PHP and ASP in series to
> >> >> > generate HTML?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If they are, they can turn ASP tags *OFF* in php.ini
> >> >> >
> >> >> > And they certainly aren't going to be distributing that setup
> >>
> >> outside
> >>
> >> >> > their own little world...
> >> >>
> >> >> I've seen such code on the net some time ago...
> >> >>
> >> >> But should you distribute PHP code with ASP tags? That's not good
> >> >> either i think. So there's no use of the ASP tags, and they can only
> >> >> interfere with ASP.
> >> >>
> >> >> Tijnema
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --
> >> >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> >> >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php