Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28809
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.132.244 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=D5XiUF+ceqOFdc8bTJL1BP/8jDziBobMW4BeBIgCPwVH8bzRWx0rt4vCy5hk6BMZusV+/EWlBPWTDmgo8gl0LXqFDUacWe+5V7wifdj+7uYZPIIhsduAOPYQ6gjlqQSmtB7pDZ59b/y51WGCRKvj3ILqiUngLCS1i36yW9DCL3Y=
Message-ID: <d8269d910704140213h57e828fam2bcd4c55b1ea80c4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:13:17 +0200
To: "Bart de Boer" <bart@mediawave.nl>
Cc: "Guilherme Blanco" <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>, ceo@l-i-e.com, 
	"Chad Daelhousen" <chad@herballure.com>, 
	"Ron Korving" <r.korving@xit.nl>, internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <46209A3F.8040701@mediawave.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <461E894C.104@zend.com>
	 <39254.195.22.180.233.1176451275.squirrel@avilys.eik.lt>
	 <4858f9d90704130213h4b440ac4w7518943b10627439@mail.gmail.com>
	 <93.FC.47553.9EB4F164@pb1.pair.com> <461F7449.7060003@herballure.com>
	 <d8269d910704130716s2b9efbbw577c09d3627a24a3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <37936.216.230.84.67.1176500697.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com>
	 <d8269d910704131454x69e4c25bm4279997ab572c5b8@mail.gmail.com>
	 <bcb7aa500704131721y2fed50a3u736df191fd0e6ab3@mail.gmail.com>
	 <46209A3F.8040701@mediawave.nl>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] dropping asp_tags in HEAD
From: tijnema@gmail.com ("Tijnema !")

On 4/14/07, Bart de Boer <bart@mediawave.nl> wrote:
>
> I think ASP tags should go too... Simply because it's not standards
> compliant and I think it's good if people are forced to make nice
> standards compliant documents... I'd even go so far as to favor dropping
> short tags too...
>
> <? echo "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\" ?>\n"; ?>
>
> What a mess!...

What about the even shorter version:
<?="<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\" ?>\n"; ?>

That's real ugly code...

Tijnema
>
>
> Guilherme Blanco wrote:
> > I really can't see a reason to mantain ASP tags.
> >
> > Ok, short tags is good because of <?=$something?>, but it doesn't
> > behavior well with XML documents. So, if your intention is to change
> > short tags to ASP tag in a near future, ok. ASP tags does not mix XML
> > documents.
> > Otherwise, ASP tags is the most useless thing I've ever heard in PHP
> > sphere. I really don't know why wasn't it dropped in PHP5.
> >
> > That's what I think... IMHO.
> >
> >
> > []s,
> >
> > On 4/13/07, Tijnema ! <tijnema@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 4/13/07, Richard Lynch <ceo@l-i-e.com> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, April 13, 2007 9:16 am, Tijnema ! wrote:
> >> > > I don't see why you are all against dropping the ASP tags. I see
> >> > > people using ASP & PHP in one script, what would that do? If ASP runs
> >> > > first then there isn't a problem, but if PHP runs first, it would
> >> > > execute the ASP code.
> >> >
> >> > There are actually people running both PHP and ASP in series to
> >> > generate HTML?
> >> >
> >> > If they are, they can turn ASP tags *OFF* in php.ini
> >> >
> >> > And they certainly aren't going to be distributing that setup outside
> >> > their own little world...
> >>
> >> I've seen such code on the net some time ago...
> >>
> >> But should you distribute PHP code with ASP tags? That's not good
> >> either i think. So there's no use of the ASP tags, and they can only
> >> interfere with ASP.
> >>
> >> Tijnema
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>