Newsgroups: php.internals,php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28807 php.internals:28808 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23626 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Apr 2007 09:09:24 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 23611 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2007 09:09:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Apr 2007 09:09:24 -0000 X-Host-Fingerprint: 194.109.253.196 mediawave.xs4all.nl Received: from [194.109.253.196] ([194.109.253.196:11834] helo=localhost.localdomain) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 45/C7-36094-24A90264 for ; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 05:09:23 -0400 To: internals@lists.php.net,Guilherme Blanco Message-ID: <46209A3F.8040701@mediawave.nl> Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:09:19 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: "Tijnema !" , ceo@l-i-e.com, Chad Daelhousen , Ron Korving , internals@lists.php.net References: <461E894C.104@zend.com> <461E929A.3060601@zend.com> <4858f9d90704130048n67dd6b17s2e19a433873fc272@mail.gmail.com> <39254.195.22.180.233.1176451275.squirrel@avilys.eik.lt> <4858f9d90704130213h4b440ac4w7518943b10627439@mail.gmail.com> <93.FC.47553.9EB4F164@pb1.pair.com> <461F7449.7060003@herballure.com> <37936.216.230.84.67.1176500697.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Posted-By: 194.109.253.196 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] dropping asp_tags in HEAD From: bart@mediawave.nl (Bart de Boer) I think ASP tags should go too... Simply because it's not standards compliant and I think it's good if people are forced to make nice standards compliant documents... I'd even go so far as to favor dropping short tags too... \n"; ?> What a mess!... Guilherme Blanco wrote: > I really can't see a reason to mantain ASP tags. > > Ok, short tags is good because of , but it doesn't > behavior well with XML documents. So, if your intention is to change > short tags to ASP tag in a near future, ok. ASP tags does not mix XML > documents. > Otherwise, ASP tags is the most useless thing I've ever heard in PHP > sphere. I really don't know why wasn't it dropped in PHP5. > > That's what I think... IMHO. > > > []s, > > On 4/13/07, Tijnema ! wrote: >> On 4/13/07, Richard Lynch wrote: >> > On Fri, April 13, 2007 9:16 am, Tijnema ! wrote: >> > > I don't see why you are all against dropping the ASP tags. I see >> > > people using ASP & PHP in one script, what would that do? If ASP runs >> > > first then there isn't a problem, but if PHP runs first, it would >> > > execute the ASP code. >> > >> > There are actually people running both PHP and ASP in series to >> > generate HTML? >> > >> > If they are, they can turn ASP tags *OFF* in php.ini >> > >> > And they certainly aren't going to be distributing that setup outside >> > their own little world... >> >> I've seen such code on the net some time ago... >> >> But should you distribute PHP code with ASP tags? That's not good >> either i think. So there's no use of the ASP tags, and they can only >> interfere with ASP. >> >> Tijnema >> >> > >> >> -- >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php >> >> > >