Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28788
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.132.246 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=P9QYpi2sCEmFRnpGZ3NYFhDDfwLqvlssvM3aF5qvX4M6ccfdEp3wmmKyGpi0QN8aBuz2N5cblNG79UMrUznS6a275N3SnzcaPFyn4tqnz+oPqQnW7gUf5saWnoLXqvh6Ya63lDLZTNOj7t70ncWNV4dTPXASZGbtgAq8UePr/B4=
Message-ID: <d8269d910704130646p7ba917f0m3a3b10a53eb3e1a5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:46:56 +0100
To: "Andrew Hutchings" <andrew@linuxjedi.co.uk>
Cc: internals@lists.php.net
In-Reply-To: <36.F7.47553.4513F164@pb1.pair.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <200704112329.l3BNTVnK000581@post.webmailer.de>
	 <A0.3C.43628.7E6BD164@pb1.pair.com>
	 <200704121638.01772.lists@block-online.eu>
	 <d8269d910704122356q2bf2b521q530b41ec6e1976f5@mail.gmail.com>
	 <36.F7.47553.4513F164@pb1.pair.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: php feature
From: tijnema@gmail.com ("Tijnema !")

On 4/13/07, Andrew Hutchings <andrew@linuxjedi.co.uk> wrote:
> Tijnema ! wrote:
> > On 4/12/07, Oliver Block <lists@block-online.eu> wrote:
> >> Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 06:34 schrieb Andrew Hutchings:
> >> > Isn't that what a database is for (e.g. MySQL)?
> >>
> >> No. - It's that what a symbol table is for.:-)
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Oliver
> >
> > You simply could create a table with 2 columns 'key' and 'value', and
> > so you could easily store both :)
> >
>
> I can see where Oliver is coming from, it would be a lot quicker to do
> it that way.  But I can imagine there would be problems making something
> like that work with all the different types of Apache workers, etc...
> without some kind of separate daemon handling it.
>
> Regards
> Andrew

I think that will screw up some things, for example when using 2 the
same scripts, on the same apache, but on different locations.

In current ways, the programmer would create a database, and use a
separate table for both scripts. But if these "application variables"
are there, the programmer would use those, but then script 1 & 2 would
both share the same variables, and so that would give a lot of
trouble.
Especially because a lot people use shared hosting these days, and
that means that they all run on the same apache. and so they would
share the same "application variables". So if person a & b both
install the same script on a different domain. They would work like 1
script, and that just goes wrong.

Tijnema
> --
> Andrew Hutchings - Linux Jedi - http://www.linuxjedi.co.uk/
> Windows is the path to the darkside...Windows leads to Blue Screen. Blue
> Screen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering...I sense much
> Windows in you.
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>