Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28768 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86774 invoked by uid 1010); 12 Apr 2007 23:00:57 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86759 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2007 23:00:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Apr 2007 23:00:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=false.hopes@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=false.hopes@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.184.228 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: false.hopes@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.184.228 wr-out-0506.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [64.233.184.228] ([64.233.184.228:42722] helo=wr-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id C1/43-52881-82ABE164 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:00:57 -0400 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i21so629018wra for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:00:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=O1ljZ2Q+bTGLWwe0/6qM8FQgoiuAaxsazdFQxzT9q2QC+KA9bxEif9IO8OM2A/FZ7rDKk87xWsQyBa7AhmJbQV6IKO6Cegb0SZ+pgHDJrMCYDmjFoX6B5zE6Oc4qdziZqXTz0uXIVcxTWlsDjZEFJ1yc0Rzo99f3GUgnV3P5Vmg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i2BuuyAvf0TnJzq1YGVlEmnRGYku3FBfQPZUW6+9GbVo1LHzNnhZfn5DYMPmAS0h15A5Zaiq9AeOQrulZ4UTLkcYt2FFQv4o75w6ki09b65ubGuSg8uqAVq41y/2t/ucx7wFF7dEayGRStoO4xE4R8BdkqLYB0WqUGH5AGRsNgU= Received: by 10.115.46.9 with SMTP id y9mr870402waj.1176418853276; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.182.9 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:00:53 -0400 To: ceo@l-i-e.com Cc: "Antony Dovgal" , "PHP Internals List" In-Reply-To: <57902.216.230.84.67.1176417970.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <461E894C.104@zend.com> <461E8AE8.8090208@krug.dk> <461E8E91.9000501@zend.com> <461E9008.6070701@gmail.com> <461E929A.3060601@zend.com> <57902.216.230.84.67.1176417970.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] dropping asp_tags in HEAD From: false.hopes@gmail.com ("Robert Deaton") On 4/12/07, Richard Lynch wrote: > On Thu, April 12, 2007 3:12 pm, Antony Dovgal wrote: > > Surely we must to keep a setting just because two people in the world > > use it. > > I'm afraid their apps won't run on PHP6 anyway because of numerous > > major changes > > (already done and still planned), so one more cleanup won't hurt > > anyone. > > What is the benefit to dropping these things? > > I've never quite understood the impetus behind losing short tags and > asp tags... I understand the need to remove short tags. Here's the reason: