Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28757 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77157 invoked by uid 1010); 12 Apr 2007 19:55:05 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77141 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2007 19:55:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Apr 2007 19:55:05 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:32024] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2D/D1-60779-49E8E164 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:55:00 -0400 Received: (qmail 16711 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2007 19:54:56 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 12 Apr 2007 19:54:56 -0000 Message-ID: <461E8E91.9000501@zend.com> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:54:57 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edin Kadribasic CC: PHP Internals List References: <461E894C.104@zend.com> <461E8AE8.8090208@krug.dk> In-Reply-To: <461E8AE8.8090208@krug.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] dropping asp_tags in HEAD From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 04/12/2007 11:39 PM, Edin Kadribasic wrote: > Antony Dovgal wrote: >> Hello all. >> >> If there are no objections, I'm going to drop asp_tags in HEAD tomorrow. >> You can see the patch here: >> http://tony2001.phpclub.net/dev/tmp/kill_asp_tags.diff > > Big objection from here. See my other email. Please point me to the discussion. > Discussed and agreed against removing tags since that creates 0% gain > and much pain for some people. I'm sure using an option which is Off by default have been causing a lot of pain for them all these years, so it's time to fix the app and forget. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal