Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28171 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43713 invoked by uid 1010); 27 Feb 2007 20:48:46 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43698 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2007 20:48:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2007 20:48:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=helly@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=helly@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 85.214.94.56 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: helly@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 85.214.94.56 aixcept.net Received: from [85.214.94.56] ([85.214.94.56:59627] helo=h1149922.serverkompetenz.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DD/47-04907-B2994E54 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:48:45 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.3] (dslb-084-063-004-173.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.63.4.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h1149922.serverkompetenz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70C31B363B; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:48:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 21:48:43 +0100 Reply-To: Marcus Boerger X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <346259962.20070227214843@marcus-boerger.de> To: Antony Dovgal CC: Sebastian Bergmann , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <45E46341.5010303@zend.com> References: <45E40A1B.1030700@zend.com> <45E46341.5010303@zend.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Benchmark Suite From: helly@php.net (Marcus Boerger) Hello Antony, QA sounds fine. Top-level is also fine as we have no real mathing place. When we offer it through QA we might aswell use qw-web as the cvs module but a seperate one sounds better. best regards marcus Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 5:58:41 PM, you wrote: > On 02/27/2007 02:42 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: >> Antony Dovgal wrote: >>> I like it. Please continue. >> >> Okay, great. Now: where should I put it? I think the current approach of >> having bench.php duplicated in each branch of the Zend Engine is sub- >> optimal. Maybe we could create a new top-level CVS module for this? > Maybe. > But separate CVS module would make sense only if we're going to release it separately. > I guess qa.php.net would be a good place for such releases. > Opinions? > -- > Wbr, > Antony Dovgal Best regards, Marcus