Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28169 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57618 invoked by uid 1010); 27 Feb 2007 16:58:50 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57603 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2007 16:58:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Feb 2007 16:58:50 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:37183] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 14/D2-61866-84364E54 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:58:50 -0500 Received: (qmail 11437 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2007 16:56:58 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 27 Feb 2007 16:56:58 -0000 Message-ID: <45E46341.5010303@zend.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:58:41 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Bergmann CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <45E40A1B.1030700@zend.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Benchmark Suite From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 02/27/2007 02:42 PM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > Antony Dovgal wrote: >> I like it. Please continue. > > Okay, great. Now: where should I put it? I think the current approach of > having bench.php duplicated in each branch of the Zend Engine is sub- > optimal. Maybe we could create a new top-level CVS module for this? Maybe. But separate CVS module would make sense only if we're going to release it separately. I guess qa.php.net would be a good place for such releases. Opinions? -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal