Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28147
Return-Path: <antony@zend.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 72888 invoked by uid 1010); 26 Feb 2007 07:47:32 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 72873 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2007 07:47:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 26 Feb 2007 07:47:32 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4)
Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:6908] helo=mail.zend.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 03/7D-50853-29092E54 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:47:32 -0500
Received: (qmail 13214 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2007 07:45:41 -0000
Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1)
  by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 26 Feb 2007 07:45:41 -0000
Message-ID: <45E2908B.6000107@zend.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:47:23 +0300
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To:  info@a-wing.co.uk
CC:  internals@lists.php.net
References: <34.6F.06593.37802E54@pb1.pair.com> <45E20EE6.9000809@zend.com> <84.C1.06593.8A412E54@pb1.pair.com> <45E219FF.6040608@zend.com> <E2.C1.16533.43B12E54@pb1.pair.com> <45E21D0C.9060101@zend.com> <BF.34.50853.50242E54@pb1.pair.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF.34.50853.50242E54@pb1.pair.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.1 twice as slow?
From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal)

On 02/26/2007 05:12 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
> Antony Dovgal wrote:
>> Thanks in advance.
>> Btw, I would appreciate if you also try 5.2.2-dev snapshot, just to see
>> if it makes any difference.
> 
> Up very late with my youngest son being sick so just compiled the
> snapshot made about 40 minutes ago with the same options, here are the
> results:
<skip>
> Much better than the score I was getting for 5.2.1 although some of the
> tests are slightly slower than 5.2.0.

I'm sure if won't see any difference if you run the bench a dozen of times, 
the results depend on current system status.

-- 
Wbr, 
Antony Dovgal