Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28144 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37291 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Feb 2007 23:34:44 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 37275 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2007 23:34:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2007 23:34:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:50231] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id ED/B2-16533-21D12E54 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 18:34:44 -0500 Received: (qmail 5681 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2007 23:32:53 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 25 Feb 2007 23:32:53 -0000 Message-ID: <45E21D0C.9060101@zend.com> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:34:36 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: info@a-wing.co.uk CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <34.6F.06593.37802E54@pb1.pair.com> <45E20EE6.9000809@zend.com> <84.C1.06593.8A412E54@pb1.pair.com> <45E219FF.6040608@zend.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.2.1 twice as slow? From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 02/26/2007 02:26 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote: > Antony Dovgal wrote: >> Please remove all these options and try with just ./configure >> --disable-all. > > Will do in the morning and report back. I will also try an un-optimised > standard i386 build of each as see what happens. Thanks in advance. Btw, I would appreciate if you also try 5.2.2-dev snapshot, just to see if it makes any difference. > If it is any help (forgot to mention before) I am using gcc 4.1.0 and > the box is running CentOS4. I believe updating GCC to the latest version (4.1.2) might also help, GCC 4.1.x is known to be extremely picky in some cases. >> Also please make sure the same CFLAGS are _really_ used in the build. > > Already have confirmed visually during compile and using analyse-x86 on > the binary. Ok. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal