Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:28087 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98933 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Feb 2007 13:09:23 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 98918 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2007 13:09:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Feb 2007 13:09:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:16893] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 00/B4-21126-203FAD54 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 08:09:23 -0500 Received: (qmail 8723 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2007 13:07:37 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 20 Feb 2007 13:07:37 -0000 Message-ID: <45DAF2FF.8060808@zend.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:09:19 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: PHP Developers Mailing List , PHP Quality Assurance Team Mailing List References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-QA] 4.4.6RC1 From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 02/20/2007 03:55 PM, Derick Rethans wrote: > Hello! > > there is a critical issues in PHP 4.4.5: > - when register_globals = On, sessions don't work correctly (segfaults). > > Because of this I'd like to release a 4.4.6 soon with this fixes. As > there is also an upgrade to pcre 7.0 we'd need atleast one RC, which I > plan to release on Thursday. > > Any opinions? Agree, I believe one RC is required in this particular case. Looks good to me. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal