Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:27790 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95386 invoked by uid 1010); 5 Feb 2007 07:25:20 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95371 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2007 07:25:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Feb 2007 07:25:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=brianm@dealnews.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=brianm@dealnews.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain dealnews.com designates 129.41.69.185 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: brianm@dealnews.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 129.41.69.185 smtp.dealnews.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [129.41.69.185] ([129.41.69.185:45216] helo=smtp.dealnews.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6E/CB-18726-FDBD6C54 for ; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 02:25:20 -0500 Received: (qmail 3565 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2007 02:25:17 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.1.6.4?) (10.1.6.4) by -H with SMTP; 5 Feb 2007 02:25:17 -0500 Message-ID: <45C6DBDC.6080705@dealnews.com> Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 01:25:16 -0600 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Macintosh/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sara Golemon CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <84D43AA9-5958-4E0B-8806-825B0CBA38BD@omniti.com> <45C66C28.1040209@php.net> In-Reply-To: <45C66C28.1040209@php.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: RFC extensions_path directive From: brianm@dealnews.com (Brian Moon) +1 and a +1 on Sara's comment. Especially if we are talking about PHP6. I could see an argument for 5.x not getting this in extension_dir. But, I still think sticking with one setting is better. Sara Golemon wrote: >> To facilitate this, I propose that we create a new directive called >> extensions_path that allows the sysadmin to configure a search path >> for extensions. I see the usage as going something like this: >> >> extensions_path = "/local/extensions:$DEFAULT_EXTENSIONS_DIR" >> > Seems very useful and a good tool for administrators to keep their > installations organized. > > +1, but I'd rather see extension_dir expanded than add a new option > which does much the same thing. > > -Sara > -- Brian Moon ------------- http://dealnews.com/ It's good to be cheap =)