Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:27304
Return-Path: <ilia@prohost.org>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 50823 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Jan 2007 20:08:18 -0000
Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net
Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 50808 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2007 20:08:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 6 Jan 2007 20:08:18 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ilia@prohost.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ilia@prohost.org; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain prohost.org from 64.233.162.224 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ilia@prohost.org
X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.162.224 nz-out-0506.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6
Received: from [64.233.162.224] ([64.233.162.224:64299] helo=nz-out-0506.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 8E/53-01582-1B100A54 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 15:08:17 -0500
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k1so3850506nzf
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:08:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.65.192.16 with SMTP id u16mr3042784qbp.1168114094169;
        Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:08:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.6? ( [74.108.69.82])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id e16sm29113204qbe.2007.01.06.12.08.13;
        Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:08:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1565089753.20070106204823@marcus-boerger.de>
References: <459F1C08.7040300@krug.dk> <618CF1AA-CBDB-4863-9EFF-7A766D23819C@prohost.org> <1565089753.20070106204823@marcus-boerger.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-ID: <BC0E36E5-04BF-4168-AE71-9C17BF214E62@prohost.org>
Cc: Edin Kadribasic <edin@krug.dk>,
 PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 15:08:11 -0500
To: Marcus Boerger <helly@php.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Windows build
From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky)

 From what I know Edin uses VC++ 6.0 which works just fine for our  
needs. So, I see no reason to move away from that unless someone can  
present a really good reason why it should be done.


On 6-Jan-07, at 2:48 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:

> Hello Ilia,
>
>   weel 2002 aka 7.0 or 2003 aka 7.1 are pretty fine. We have left  
> behind
> 6.0 long ago :-)
>
> best regards
> marcus
>
> Saturday, January 6, 2007, 5:44:55 AM, you wrote:
>
>> Edin,
>
>> Thanks for the detailed analysis and spending time analyzing the
>> issue. Based on what you've said I think our best option is to go
>> back to VC++ 6.0 for this release, we are too far along in the
>> release cycle to experiment with things. Perhaps for the next release
>> we can revisit the issue, assuming there an interest and a benefit of
>> using VC++ 8.0 can be quantified.
>
>> On 5-Jan-07, at 10:48 PM, Edin Kadribasic wrote:
>
>>> I looked around at other projects and everyone seems to be using  
>>> VC++
>>> 6.0 for their builds (Active state, apache, ...) which eliminates  
>>> all
>>> the hassle with bundling C runtime, etc.
>>>
>>> So I think the best thing for us would be to stick to the good old C
>>> compiler for making the Windows distro.
>
>> Ilia Alshanetsky
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>  Marcus
>

Ilia Alshanetsky