Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:27291
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: good
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=hJ4d/spxHgW5YrXF44gaz8LeGyHhL9qCOf/xJS7CeIQQ7vmU2pZ/jfRdgLfRdJ/fhuIq1qZyRJFZ2NCpB9snpWezyKUPI6mg9Mac10BKyJSgbZDGPM2Oli6eUAj7KpCDn9yveJMsI0+mvPKhT0yYO5lUJ0mnZMRcdOn7UevQThA=
Message-ID: <7526e9dd0701052032q7ce8c3c9l8ba846b248925a58@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 11:32:59 +0700
To: "Edin Kadribasic" <edin@krug.dk>
Cc: "PHP Internals List" <internals@lists.php.net>
In-Reply-To: <459F1C08.7040300@krug.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <459F1C08.7040300@krug.dk>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Windows build
From: firmanw@gmail.com ("Firman Wandayandi")

Hi,

On 1/6/07, Edin Kadribasic <edin@krug.dk> wrote:
> It seems that VC++ 8.0 (Visual Studio 2005) brings more trouble that its
> worth. Mainly the way it deals with the C runtime. After spending hours
> and hours of trying to figure out the way to make PHP work under Apache
> on Windows and be able to load extensions, I'm throwing in the towel.
>
> I can get PHP to work fine on the command line, both cgi and cli. It
> also works fine under IIS using fastcgi. But loading sapi dll into a
> webserver (not using php.exe or php-cgi.exe) works for the sapi itself,
> but trying to load any extensions via php.ini fails miserably. Sometimes
> you will get an error that the C runtime was attempted to be loaded in
> an illegal way, sometime PHP will claim that the extension does not
> exist, etc.
>

Confirmed.

> I looked around at other projects and everyone seems to be using VC++
> 6.0 for their builds (Active state, apache, ...) which eliminates all
> the hassle with bundling C runtime, etc.
>
> So I think the best thing for us would be to stick to the good old C
> compiler for making the Windows distro.
>

I'm not sure which the best one of compiler. But agree, I think the
old compiler is a right one ATM. While still investigating and finding
the solution to make everything works.

BTW, is it just suspend for swicthing to VC++ 8.0 or stick on the old
one (for future plan) ?

-- 
Firman Wandayandi <http://firmanw.org/>