Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:27280 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93077 invoked by uid 1010); 5 Jan 2007 14:15:58 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93062 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2007 14:15:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jan 2007 14:15:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php_lists@realplain.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php_lists@realplain.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain realplain.com from 69.179.208.43 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php_lists@realplain.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 69.179.208.43 msa3-mx.centurytel.net Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [69.179.208.43] ([69.179.208.43:33851] helo=msa3-mx.centurytel.net) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 62/6D-01582-D9D5E954 for ; Fri, 05 Jan 2007 09:15:57 -0500 Received: from pc1 (d35-116.rt-bras.wnvl.centurytel.net [69.179.162.116]) by msa3-mx.centurytel.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l05EFqqv030614; Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:15:52 -0600 Message-ID: <010a01c730d4$02ac3a30$0201a8c0@pc1> To: "php-dev Internals" , "Andrei Zmievski" References: <020801c725ce$fe9fe190$0201a8c0@pc1> <90c8af0c49a1264f019f15b797817313@gravitonic.com> <01c901c73002$591dc6e0$0201a8c0@pc1> <7b7100f58b16f2ada86e55f00f8abdbf@gravitonic.com> Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:15:53 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] The new printf implementation From: php_lists@realplain.com ("Matt Wilmas") Hi Andrei, I have no idea. :-) It doesn't really affect me personally that I can think of, so whatever you guys decide. I don't feel strongly either way... I just wanted to bring up the internal changes originally after the locale stuff created the bug with number_format() (maybe a couple others). In your first reply (weeks ago), you mentioned POSIX locales being deprecated in Unicode mode, and I assumed you were referring to the internal printf, but maybe you meant PHP's userland printf. Well, whichever version, I'm neutral on what to do. Oh, and to clarify that the locale-awareness wasn't "a good idea" in my last message, I meant as far as breaking things (internal or 3rd party), not just in general... Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrei Zmievski" Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 > So we should remove locale-awareness then? > > -Andrei > > On Jan 4, 2007, at 5:15 AM, Matt Wilmas wrote: > > > Hi Andrei, > > > > No, not really... :-) I agree with what you said. Even in > > non-Unicode mode > > or 5.2, it doesn't seem like making things locale aware which weren't > > before > > is a good idea (3rd party code that's relying on behavior, etc. which I > > think was mentioned elsewhere). > > > > > > Matt