Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:27224 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36137 invoked by uid 1010); 31 Dec 2006 01:28:11 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36122 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2006 01:28:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 Dec 2006 01:28:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:53843] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BA/E0-30635-A2217954 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 20:28:11 -0500 Received: (qmail 24754 invoked from network); 31 Dec 2006 01:26:32 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 31 Dec 2006 01:26:32 -0000 Message-ID: <45971225.9040803@zend.com> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 04:28:05 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vlad Bosinceanu CC: Kevin Waterson , internals@lists.php.net References: <20061231094951.48487025.kevin@oceania.net> <4596F6F8.6030605@zend.com> <20061231104351.6056dc73.kevin@oceania.net> <45970292.2010404@zend.com> <45970C83.7050500@pseudo-infinity.ro> In-Reply-To: <45970C83.7050500@pseudo-infinity.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Include fileinfo in core From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 12/31/2006 04:04 AM, Vlad Bosinceanu wrote: > Maybe it would be a good idea to have a list of recommended extensions > for hosting providers that states what functionality an extension > provides, what it depends upon and some brief analysis of runtime > overhead and possibilities of abuse. While this would obviously not > fully solve the problem it may encourage hosts to take extensions that > are not bundled with the default distribution into consideration. This > and similar suggestions could be grouped into some sort of guidelines > for hosting providers. I'm sure such a list would be certainly appreciated, though I don't believe it could change anything. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal