Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:27157 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95526 invoked by uid 1010); 21 Dec 2006 07:03:39 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95511 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2006 07:03:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Dec 2006 07:03:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lester@lsces.co.uk; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lester@lsces.co.uk; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lsces.co.uk from 194.73.73.210 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lester@lsces.co.uk X-Host-Fingerprint: 194.73.73.210 c2bthomr02.btconnect.com FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.3) (2) Received: from [194.73.73.210] ([194.73.73.210:16569] helo=c2bthomr02.btconnect.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FD/E8-22805-5813A854 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 02:03:04 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (host81-138-11-136.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.138.11.136]) by c2bthomr02.btconnect.com with ESMTP id FXC49258; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:56:48 GMT Message-ID: <458A3189.5010809@lsces.co.uk> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 07:02:33 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060910 SeaMonkey/1.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: internals@lists.php.net References: <025501c72488$b1d5f5d0$5210a8c0@zend.2k> In-Reply-To: <025501c72488$b1d5f5d0$5210a8c0@zend.2k> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Dumping support for Windows 98 and Windows ME From: lester@lsces.co.uk (Lester Caine) Andi Gutmans wrote: > Hi all, > > In the spirit of dumping Win95 support in PHP 5, I'd like to officialy dump > Windows 98&ME support from this point onwards. We are sticking to old > Windows APIs because of this support which doesn't make much sense > considering that Microsoft has stopped supporting those platforms six months > ago (http://www.microsoft.com/windows/support/endofsupport.mspx). > So I see no reason for us to support Micorsoft customers better than they do > :) Those who are stuck on those versions should just stick to the versions > up to PHP 5.2.0. They are not getting Windows updates, so why should they > get PHP updates? > > Unless anyone disagrees with this, we'll go ahead with this. As someone who still ships W98SE as a server solution on distributed systems I would flag that just because Microsoft killed it, there are still large areas of the world who have kit that can't suport anything better. That said - as long as a W98 COMPATIBLE version of PHP5 is flagged then there should not be a problem. Personally I don't actually run the PHP stuff on the W98SE slaves, just just local fallback stuff for when a network link fails. Just quoting for a job that has some 200 machines and that should cover the cost of finally ditching the W98SE in favour of Linux anyway :) We have to PAY for XP licences even if the hardware will only handle W98SE :( -- Lester Caine - G8HFL ----------------------------- L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://home.lsces.co.uk Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://home.lsces.co.uk/ModelEngineersDigitalWorkshop/ Treasurer - Firebird Foundation Inc. - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php