Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:27144 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94649 invoked by uid 1010); 20 Dec 2006 10:20:08 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94634 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2006 10:20:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Dec 2006 10:20:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:27114] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B8/C5-55975-43E09854 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:20:07 -0500 Received: (qmail 8019 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2006 10:17:58 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 20 Dec 2006 10:17:58 -0000 Message-ID: <45890E30.5090806@zend.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:19:28 +0300 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Wharmby CC: PHP internals list References: <3B40503A-75F6-41EC-BFCF-56D777501FA5@prohost.org> <009101c71af6$fe795530$6600a8c0@zend.2k> <4e89b4260612090149u65e66e55jd374fdf2ef403793@mail.gmail.com> <458901CE.8070305@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <458901CE.8070305@googlemail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Moving COM, Socket & mhash to PECL From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 12/20/2006 12:26 PM, Andy Wharmby wrote: > Hi Internals > I am still pretty new to PHP but having spent the last couple of > months reviewing the PHP code and > getting to know how PHP ticks I would be happy to volunteer some time > take a look at some of the > outstanding issues with the COM extension. I am about to go on vacation > for a couple of weeks but I > will certainly have time early in 2007 to investigate some of the OPEN > defects. > > As a couple of others (Frank and Pierre) have also volunteered time > whats the best way to work this so that > we make best use of our time. Should I just add add a comment to a > defect when I start investigating it and > then post any fixes I come up with to list for review ? Yes, that would work. Thanks. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal