Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:26857 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41513 invoked by uid 1010); 8 Dec 2006 20:19:39 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41498 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2006 20:19:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Dec 2006 20:19:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=zeev@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=zeev@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: zeev@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:57716] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6C/DB-64559-7B8C9754 for ; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 15:19:39 -0500 Message-ID: <6C.DB.64559.7B8C9754@pb1.pair.com> Received: (qmail 27968 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2006 20:17:32 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO zeev-notebook.zend.com) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Dec 2006 20:17:32 -0000 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:18:59 +0200 To: Derick Rethans Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky , PHP internals In-Reply-To: References: <3B40503A-75F6-41EC-BFCF-56D777501FA5@prohost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Moving COM, Socket & mhash to PECL From: zeev@zend.com (Zeev Suraski) At 21:51 08/12/2006, Derick Rethans wrote: >On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > > > This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-). I am > thinking of > > moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions to PECL in 5.2 and 6.0 releases > > and was hoping to hear for & against arguments. > > The reason for the making this move are as follows: > > > > COM: > >-1, but we need somebody to have a look at the issues there. > > > mhash: > >+1 > > > sockets: > >-1 in 5.x, +1 in 6.0 as there are still many people who use this stuff. >Also we need to make sure that all the stuff done by ext/socket can also >be done by the streams in some way. Same as Derick and Stas. Zeev