Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:26854 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31230 invoked by uid 1010); 8 Dec 2006 19:52:48 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31215 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2006 19:52:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Dec 2006 19:52:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 82.94.239.5 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.94.239.5 jdi.jdi-ict.nl Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [82.94.239.5] ([82.94.239.5:48366] helo=jdi.jdi-ict.nl) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 75/D9-64559-B62C9754 for ; Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:52:47 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jdi.jdi-ict.nl (8.13.7/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kB8Jq7AH006882; Fri, 8 Dec 2006 20:52:08 +0100 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 17:51:41 -0200 (BRST) X-X-Sender: derick@localhost To: Ilia Alshanetsky cc: PHP internals In-Reply-To: <3B40503A-75F6-41EC-BFCF-56D777501FA5@prohost.org> Message-ID: References: <3B40503A-75F6-41EC-BFCF-56D777501FA5@prohost.org> X-Face: "L'&?Ah3MYF@FB4hU'XhNhLB]222(Lbr2Y@F:GE[OO;"F5p>qtFBl|yVVA&D{A(g3[C}mG:199P+5C'v.M/u@Z\![0b:Mv.[l6[uWl' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Moving COM, Socket & mhash to PECL From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > This is an exploratory e-mail, so don't panic just yet :-). I am thinking of > moving the COM, mhash and socket extensions to PECL in 5.2 and 6.0 releases > and was hoping to hear for & against arguments. > The reason for the making this move are as follows: > > COM: -1, but we need somebody to have a look at the issues there. > mhash: +1 > sockets: -1 in 5.x, +1 in 6.0 as there are still many people who use this stuff. Also we need to make sure that all the stuff done by ext/socket can also be done by the streams in some way. regards, Derick