Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:26643 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57601 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Nov 2006 15:22:01 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57586 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2006 15:22:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Nov 2006 15:22:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=wolfshoehle@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=good Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=wolfshoehle@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 66.249.82.231 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: wolfshoehle@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 66.249.82.231 wx-out-0506.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [66.249.82.231] ([66.249.82.231:19496] helo=wx-out-0506.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 29/26-01084-7128C554 for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 10:22:01 -0500 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so674692wxd for ; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:21:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=b+rpRrYd2grfJHEwfI4EvK8vCMHNJyuMIf5g2FVJ+Y/kOsDVIdCjWkLpY2QbxvQ+zT21OX/pmi0CcLDcLdKrxAWRRsuJZEuLMt4ZVO3/QpbKIXVNrOosIhijs/ncuYH0mzcq6WV6o6oXl0BjG7NKom2rLyGV7f8/XUu/LdxHnUg= Received: by 10.90.52.2 with SMTP id z2mr434586agz.1163690516955; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:21:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.93.12 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 07:21:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <9bb5e33f0611160721l6676cbe5ud0185127fad03402@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 16:21:56 +0100 To: "Wez Furlong" Cc: internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <4e89b4260611160629o1855ed28pf37139f1576fa99b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <9bb5e33f0611160505u2ac2b1dbt1b04feea4314331c@mail.gmail.com> <4e89b4260611160629o1855ed28pf37139f1576fa99b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Enable authorizer-feature in PDO_SQLITE From: wolfshoehle@googlemail.com ("Mario Wolff") 2006/11/16, Wez Furlong : > I suggest that you adjust your patch to cache the function callback > information in the pdo_dbh_t to reduce some of that overhead, and run > some benchmarks for a simple authorizer function in PHP that always > returns true vs the same script with no authorizer, so that we get a > feel for what kind of impact that has for various common queries. Is the pdo_sqlite_db_handle not the better place to store? I'm not so deep in the architecture to decide! > --Wez.