Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:26601 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67138 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Nov 2006 08:39:54 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67123 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2006 08:39:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 15 Nov 2006 08:39:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rquadling@googlemail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rquadling@googlemail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=good Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain googlemail.com designates 64.233.166.176 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: good X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rquadling@googlemail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.233.166.176 py-out-1112.google.com Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [64.233.166.176] ([64.233.166.176:7179] helo=py-out-1112.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BC/52-51418-752DA554 for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:39:52 -0500 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so78435pyb for ; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:39:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=googlemail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DkCfRDahNcQjghn+GN1ndAhyljeAxRbgp/83br3+dQPwEcDytpdzDoe/6m2urIDZcplEupeDLno55bLcxz3MOZBOeysTo+7ZGjMiIZz/4Qg0Or67iBOu6vfudOS1t7WKPInST3s/+th0SgA4iOxgZXZe1jUaODYJw2VVxMH4JdI= Received: by 10.35.103.1 with SMTP id f1mr2739689pym.1163579989009; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:39:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.97.14 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:39:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <10845a340611150039o2c51795dt5f78877ce9678d65@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 08:39:48 +0000 Reply-To: RQuadling@GoogleMail.com To: "Marcus Boerger" Cc: "Jessie Hernandez" , internals@lists.php.net In-Reply-To: <607959001.20061114205107@marcus-boerger.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4554AE0D.4080600@caedmon.net> <99.20.32592.5ED45554@pb1.pair.com> <19674119.20061111112203@marcus-boerger.de> <3D.90.24000.85F66554@pb1.pair.com> <4557017A.3020804@gmail.com> <95.78.60788.E6F39554@pb1.pair.com> <832678080.20061114090929@marcus-boerger.de> <10845a340611140036x2ad3122u7f562cfb2dca2c38@mail.gmail.com> <607959001.20061114205107@marcus-boerger.de> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Namespaces in PHP 6 - ++$take From: rquadling@googlemail.com ("Richard Quadling") Would $foo = "{mynamespace\tables_class::myconst}"; \t in "" is a tab. \m in "" is nothing but \m Thats the sort of thing I'm worried about. On 14/11/06, Marcus Boerger wrote: > Hello Richard, > > The "#" is needed for CLI mode - thus we won't remove it. In fact we > will not do anything that would cause BC problems. Also there is no > escaping issue with "\". If there is than it is outside of PHP. In > other words: > - "\" is the only single character reachable from 'western' keyboards > - $foo = "{mynamespace\myclass::myconst}"; // will be possible without > escaping > > Please people read the archives before posting here, we have discussed > all this long enough. > > Tuesday, November 14, 2006, 9:36:10 AM, you wrote: > > > The only issue with using \ is the fact that this is the escape > > character. If you are using PHP to create classes (collapsing complex > > classes into simpler ones, implementing a fake AOP), you have to > > remember to escape the escape. It just seems odd to re-use a symbol > > like this. A new symbol is better. IIHMY, I would use # and remove # > > from comments. # looks like a grid which can be thought of as a > > compartmentalisation process; i.e. grouping things together in their > > own little space - a perfect concept to explain namespaces. We already > > have singleline and block comments with // and /* ... */. Not really > > sure of the need of #. Of course, this would be an evern bigger BC. > > Even my own code uses #. > > > The triple colon (:::) is OK, but what happens during a mistype. Is > > there a possibility that :: and ::: COULD be used interchangably (an > > extreme example), producing working code? > > > > > On 14/11/06, Marcus Boerger wrote: > >> Hello Jessie, > >> > >> Tuesday, November 14, 2006, 5:00:42 AM, you wrote: > >> > >> > What does everyone else think? Are functions/constants inside namespaces > >> > really that critical? > >> > >> > Anyways, I just thought of a possible solution to the namespace > >> > separator issue, and if it's doable, then the double colon (::) can even > >> > be used and no conflicts would occur. It seems the biggest problem with > >> > handling namespaces is determining if a symbol is a class or namespace > >> > at compile-time. I am no expert in flex/bison, but I was thinking that a > >> > state can be used, such as LOOKING_FOR_CLASS_OR_NAMESPACE, which will > >> > return either a T_CLASS_NAME or T_NAMESPACE_NAME token depending on > >> > whether the symbol is known to be a class or namespace. The user will > >> > add either a "using" or "import" statement before the use of the symbol, > >> > and this will allow the parser to know what that symbol is in the > >> > compilation phase. As an example: > >> > >> > >> > // BEGIN CODE > >> > using namespace PEAR::File; > >> > $items = File::Find::glob( '!.*\.php$!', $dir, 'perl' ); > >> > // END CODE > >> > >> > >> > The first statement will add an entry into a hashtable (used during > >> > compilation) indicating that "PEAR", "PEAR::File", and "File" are > >> > namespaces ("File" will be imported in the current file only). When > >> > "File::Find::glob" is parsed, the compiler already knows that "File" is > >> > a namespace, so "Find" must be a class inside that namespace, and "glob" > >> > must be a static method. With this, functions and constants can easily > >> > be added inside namespaces, as the "using" or "import" statement will > >> > indicate to the parser which portion of the qualified name is a namespace. > >> > >> > Is this feasible in flex/bison? Let me know if anything needs clarification. > >> > >> Short: no > >> > >> Long: Please stop confusion here. We will get namespace innwith either ":::" > >> or "\" depending on who is going to implement it and what otherissues that > >> one will encounter. Later we may decide based on that implementation whether > >> it might be possible to use a different seperator. Btw, ifI wereto implement > >> namespacesupport today i would go with "\" as that is easier to translate to > >> a directory/file name in an __autoload function. While yesturday people > >> nearly convinced me (during the last conferences) that ":::" is closer to > >> the class/member seperator "::". > >> > >> best regards > >> marcus > >> > >> > >> -- > >> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > >> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >> > >> > > > > > > Best regards, > Marcus > > -- ----- Richard Quadling Zend Certified Engineer : http://zend.com/zce.php?c=ZEND002498&r=213474731 "Standing on the shoulders of some very clever giants!"