Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:26555 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93864 invoked by uid 1010); 14 Nov 2006 08:47:34 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93849 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2006 08:47:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Nov 2006 08:47:34 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=stas@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=stas@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: stas@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:48376] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 5D/46-50866-4A289554 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2006 03:47:34 -0500 Received: (qmail 13765 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2006 08:46:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (192.168.2.100) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 14 Nov 2006 08:46:04 -0000 Message-ID: <455982A4.5030308@zend.com> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:47:32 -0800 Organization: Zend Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RQuadling@GoogleMail.com CC: Antony Dovgal , php-dev References: <4558E5E7.5040809@zend.com> <10845a340611140024l4902ea09q600a43c5018e819c@mail.gmail.com> <45597FA6.90808@zend.com> <10845a340611140041p4cc13daft875f4fc99f1c8d19@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <10845a340611140041p4cc13daft875f4fc99f1c8d19@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] fgets()/fgetss() BC break in HEAD From: stas@zend.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Richard Quadling wrote: > Just because it has always done it doesn't mean it always will. That's > what BC's are about. BC, as far as I know, is "backwards compatibility". It is *exactly* about "it has always done so and it always will". And unless there's a *very* good reason not to do it, so it should be. > If this was to be a BC, having it mid version is not a good idea. > Maybe for V6 where a whole LOAD of things are going to change, making So let's add one more, just for the fun of it? > it another part of the clean up process would be a better option. There's noting more "clean" in new way than in old way - it's a matter of convention. If might be not an ideal one, but having two conventions is much worse than having one non-ideal convention - you can easily deal with latter and you will really hate the guts of the language developers for the former, once your scripts start to break. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer stas@zend.com http://www.zend.com/