Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:26360 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40219 invoked by uid 1010); 5 Nov 2006 18:13:14 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 40203 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2006 18:13:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Nov 2006 18:13:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cschneid@cschneid.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cschneid@cschneid.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain cschneid.com from 195.226.6.42 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cschneid@cschneid.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.226.6.42 darkcity.gna.ch Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [195.226.6.42] ([195.226.6.42:48935] helo=mail.gna.ch) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FD/D8-10980-9B92E454 for ; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 13:13:14 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DE0D108D; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:13:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket) id client-XXfGwGX1; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:13:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.42] (217-162-171-242.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.171.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F40D10AD; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 19:13:06 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <454E29AC.50007@cschneid.com> Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 19:13:00 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Boerger , Ilia Alshanetsky CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <005e01c6ff82$e6092c30$ec01010a@intranet.db> <2FAA3BA3-283C-445D-9648-70C207FF2251@prohost.org> <454CBD65.5040205@cschneid.com> <454D66C4.2090708@cschneid.com> <1465A1B3-C0AE-48E0-9E3A-66BDC57D89F3@prohost.org> <454E1AE2.1050106@lsces.co.uk> <745591637.20061105185719@marcus-boerger.de> In-Reply-To: <745591637.20061105185719@marcus-boerger.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gna.ch Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New Datetime class problem From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Hello Marcus, hello Ilia, now you two got me confused: Marcus Boerger wrote: > we have the same problem for functions since years, why is there suddenly > such a big problem with classes now? All new php/pecl classes will follow > one of the following rules: > - Prefix with the extension name > - Postfix with "Iterator" > - Postfix with "Exception" > that seems the same amount of protection as prefix functions with extension > name plus underscore. I don't see any problem since the above rule is in > place. This would mean classes should be prefixed by extension name... Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > The classes/functions/constants that will be added in the future will > be based largely on the names the developers of said language > components decide upon. In the event their names present issues, such > as BC breaks there would be a review done to determine the merits of > keeping or changing the name. It is really quite simple. ... or not? - Chris