Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:26339 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24904 invoked by uid 1010); 5 Nov 2006 11:43:54 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 24889 invoked from network); 5 Nov 2006 11:43:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Nov 2006 11:43:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lsmith@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lsmith@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 212.112.227.169 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lsmith@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.112.227.169 ipx11223.ipxserver.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.112.227.169] ([212.112.227.169:38462] helo=ipx11223.ipxserver.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 66/A4-24806-87ECD454 for ; Sun, 05 Nov 2006 06:43:53 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4741ADF0005; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:43:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from ipx11223.ipxserver.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (flottensignalgeber [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17685-10; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:43:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i59F7C1C5.versanet.de [89.247.193.197]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D83DF009E; Sun, 5 Nov 2006 12:43:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <454DCE6B.9000508@php.net> Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 12:43:39 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ron Korving Cc: internals@lists.php.net References: <005e01c6ff82$e6092c30$ec01010a@intranet.db> <2FAA3BA3-283C-445D-9648-70C207FF2251@prohost.org> <454CBD65.5040205@cschneid.com> <454D66C4.2090708@cschneid.com> <303397962.20061105053913@marcus-boerger.de> <454D6EDE.60202@cschneid.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by somedaemon at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] New Datetime class problem From: lsmith@php.net (Lukas Kahwe Smith) Ron Korving wrote: > - First of all, people use their classes a lot more than PHP core classes, > and so prefixing application classes is a big burden compared to prefixing > PHP core classes. Its quite trivial .. all people need to do is stick a single underscore into their class name [1]. Thats all. They only need to really prefix with anything a bit longer if they want to avoid name clashes with other third party code. > - Second, with the active record design pattern becoming more popular, > database table-names are starting to dictate class names. Err, where is the problem applying a default prefix in that scenario? And sure if there is a sensible implementation for namespaces I am sure we will get the feature. I have not yet heared any core people say that they are against the feature in general. regards, Lukas [1] http://www.php.net/manual/en/userlandnaming.php