Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:26300 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12510 invoked by uid 1010); 3 Nov 2006 15:32:03 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 12495 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2006 15:32:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Nov 2006 15:32:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=cschneid@cschneid.com; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=cschneid@cschneid.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain cschneid.com from 195.141.85.117 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: cschneid@cschneid.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 195.141.85.117 uf1.search.ch Linux 2.4/2.6 Received: from [195.141.85.117] ([195.141.85.117:53022] helo=smtp.rim.ch) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 2B/B6-02428-EE06B454 for ; Fri, 03 Nov 2006 10:32:00 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by verksam.search.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3407E3D8039; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 16:31:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown by localhost (amavisd-new, unix socket) id client-XXUU4g7K; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 16:31:54 +0100 (CET) Received: by verksam.search.ch (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 3E3293D806C; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 16:31:54 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on verksam.search.ch X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from [192.168.1.72] (ultrafilter-i [192.168.85.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by verksam.search.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687DA3D8039; Fri, 3 Nov 2006 16:31:53 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <454B60E8.8010305@cschneid.com> Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:31:52 +0100 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060911) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilia Alshanetsky Cc: Zeev Suraski , php internals LIST References: <7.0.1.0.2.20061024085428.053f9cf8@zend.com> <7f3ed2c30610240757v28702861r8d5f22f7e3047e60@mail.gmail.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20061024170856.0583dd20@zend.com> <1838975922.20061024205524@marcus-boerger.de> <71B5B01C-EDC5-46B0-8747-0706B2C7DF1F@prohost.org> In-Reply-To: <71B5B01C-EDC5-46B0-8747-0706B2C7DF1F@prohost.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at search.ch Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Why 5.2 should not be delayed for E_DEPRECATED From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > Thanks to Hannes we have a fairly complete list of changes in the error > conditions, so far people who have commented out it did not appear to > have identified anything objectionable. We need to make a decision on > how to proceed, either to roll 5.2.0 now or wait another week. My vote > is to roll things now... Out of curiosity What's the plan for E_DEPRECATED now? Regarding the release of PHP 5.2 and OO strictness: I never got any comment about my OO strictness patch to not complain about adding default values to parameters or changes on static methods which both do not break the quoted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liskov_substitution_principle I would have hoped for a little info why this patch was not considered. Regards, - Chris