Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:26243 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95341 invoked by uid 1010); 25 Oct 2006 09:10:11 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95326 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2006 09:10:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Oct 2006 09:10:11 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=antony@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=antony@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.25.124.162 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: antony@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.25.124.162 mail.zend.com Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.25.124.162] ([212.25.124.162:19145] helo=mail.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 4F/C8-34241-2F92F354 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:10:11 -0400 Received: (qmail 29974 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2006 09:08:45 -0000 Received: from internal.zend.office (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.1.1.1) by internal.zend.office with SMTP; 25 Oct 2006 09:08:45 -0000 Message-ID: <453F29ED.4050807@zend.com> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 13:10:05 +0400 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glenn Richmond CC: internals@lists.php.net References: <453F2897.1050400@ilisys.com.au> In-Reply-To: <453F2897.1050400@ilisys.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP user session handlers From: antony@zend.com (Antony Dovgal) On 10/25/2006 01:04 PM, Glenn Richmond wrote: > Hi guys, > > Just wondering what the status of the user-defined session handlers is? I don't think it makes any sense to ask such questions on the list, for the answer in most cases is "they are doing fine, thank you". Just grab the latest snapshot, test it and report any issues you see. > I've tested with 5.2rc4 and there is an issue that the references to the > user functions get erased when the user calls session_write_close or > session_destroy. This means that the system reverts to an alternative > handler. > > Any idea if this issue has been resolved or if not, how it could be > resolved? It basically makes large-scale user-defined session handlers > impossible (for general website handling). It has been discussed > previously, but no solution has been proposed as of yet. -- Wbr, Antony Dovgal