Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:26221 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53235 invoked by uid 1010); 24 Oct 2006 07:31:31 -0000 Delivered-To: ezmlm-scan-internals@lists.php.net Delivered-To: ezmlm-internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53220 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2006 07:31:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Oct 2006 07:31:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=lsmith@php.net; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=lsmith@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net from 212.112.227.169 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: lsmith@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.112.227.169 ipx11223.ipxserver.de Linux 2.5 (sometimes 2.4) (4) Received: from [212.112.227.169] ([212.112.227.169:33704] helo=ipx11223.ipxserver.de) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 76/F4-18710-151CD354 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 03:31:30 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A30DF014E; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:31:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ipx11223.ipxserver.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (flottensignalgeber [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29097-03; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:31:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (i577B682A.versanet.de [87.123.104.42]) by ipx11223.ipxserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78312DF00C7; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:31:17 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <453DC132.4020801@php.net> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:30:58 +0200 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zeev Suraski Cc: Ilia Alshanetsky , php internals LIST , Marcus Boerger References: <7.0.1.0.2.20061024085428.053f9cf8@zend.com> In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20061024085428.053f9cf8@zend.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by somedaemon at backendmedia.com Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Why 5.2 should not be delayed for E_DEPRECATED From: lsmith@php.net (Lukas Kahwe Smith) Zeev Suraski wrote: > Ilia, > > I think Wez's suggestion is the most practical one. Let's make sure we > haven't introduced any fatal errors into 5.2 (and demote them to > E_STRICT for now), and handle the rest of the suggestions afterwards. +1 I guess this is the best we can go. It might cause some trouble for people developing in E_STRICT, but I also think that 5.2.0 really needs to be in the hands of users. regards, Lukas